An institutional review board is a group registered with the federal government that is formally designated to review and monitor research involving human subjects. The purpose of the reviews is to protect the safety, rights, and welfare of research participants and to ensure institutional compliance with federal and state regulations and University policies. The Human Subjects Division manages the three Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) that review and oversee UW human subjects research.
Human subjects research requires IRB approval or a determination that the research is “exempt” from the federal regulations. Depending on the particulars of your project, you may not need to submit an IRB application at all! Whether or not IRB review is required is determined by going through a few key questions based on some regulatory definitions.
Researchers may self-determine that their project does not meet the definition of “human subjects research” using the Human Subjects Research Determination worksheet. Even if you determine that your project does not meet the definition, you may still wish to submit an application to request a formal determination letter, for example to obtain or access data from a source or if you have a complicated project. For more information:
Determinations that the human subjects research is “exempt” from the federal regulations must be made by HSD. If you believe your research may qualify for exempt status, submit an application and do not include consent materials. For more information:
Visit Do I Need IRB Review to go through the steps in order to determine if you need to submit an application for your project.
Is your study eligible for UW IRB review? If your research is happening at UW, then it’s UW research, right? It’s not that simple, and whether a project is considered “UW” research has nothing to do with physical location. It depends on whether the UW is considered “engaged” in the research through direct federal funding or human subjects activities. For more information:
Is the UW IRB the right IRB? While the UW IRB is usually the right choice for most UW research in which UW is conducting all or most of the research activities, there are many circumstances in which an external, or non-UW, IRB must review UW research instead of the UW IRB. HSD’s Reliance Team must authorize the use of a non-UW IRB in advance. For more information:
Contact HSD’s Reliance team at hsdrely@uw.edu
Human Subjects Protections Training: The UW and HSD do not currently require that researchers complete training or submit documentation of training as part of the application review process except for student and medical resident researchers as explained below. However, HSD recommends that all researchers who are new to research involving human subjects complete training in the basic ethical principles for working with human research subjects. Additionally, many funding organizations and collaborating institutions require human subjects protections training.
IRB 101 Online Tutorial: The IRB 101 tutorial is required for student and medical resident principal investigators and recommended for everyone new to working with the UW IRB. The tutorial walks you through the questions to ask to determine if you need IRB review and provides important practical information about navigating the IRB process at UW.
Good Clinical Practice Training: Researchers working in behavioral or biomedical clinical research must sometimes complete training in Good Clinical Practice (GCP) to meet the requirements of the organizations they are affiliated with, funding agencies, or study sponsors. GCP training educates researchers on the fundamental principles of conducting high quality clinical trials.
Human subjects research must be reviewed and approved in advance. Review times can vary widely depending on the type of review that is needed. Applications that require review by the full convened IRB generally take the longest. Situations that typically require longer review times include:
Median Turnaround Times (TAT) for New Applications
| Review Type | Median Turnaround |
| Determination: a formal determination that a project does not require IRB review because:
· It is not considered to be research · It does not involve human subjects · It is not considered to be UW research Note: Researchers may also self-determine that a study falls into one of these categories using the human subjects research determination worksheet. |
3.75 days |
| Exemption: a determination that the human subjects research fits into one or more exempt categories that do not require IRB review or require only limited IRB review. | 4.25 days |
| Expedited: IRB review conducted by a designated voting member rather than by the convened committee. It is used for minimal risk research that fits into one or more of the permitted expedited review categories. | 12.75 days |
| Full Board: IRB review by the convened committee at a scheduled meeting. This is required for research that is not eligible for exemption or expedited review. | 67.25 days |
| Authorization to use a non-UW IRB: Reliance requests for IRB review by a non-UW IRB instead of the UW IRB. | 4.5 days |
| RNI Determination: A formal regulatory definition made by the Regulatory Affairs team for Reportable New Information. | 7 days |
Student and medical resident principal investigators for UW IRB applications must meet the following 2 requirements:
All applications must be submitted via Zipline, UW’s eIRB system. Zipline applications include:
All applications must include one of the following application forms. HSD recommends completing the required documents before creating your study in Zipline.
Tips to Ensure a Smooth and Timely Review:
HSD has many resources to help you submit IRB applications. For help, review:
The review process in Zipline resembles a tennis match. When the application is pushed to you, HSD is not able to move forward with the review process until you respond. Similarly, once you respond to HSD, you are no longer able to make changes to the application. There can be as many rounds of back and forth as needed.
If HSD pushes the application to you, you will receive an email notification and the study will appear in your My Inbox. The application state will show as one of the following:
The general process you should follow to respond is the same:
Tips to avoid errors that may delay your review:
Review Respond to HSD in the Zipline Online Help Library for step by step instructions with screenshots.
Manage Study Access:
There are many different user roles in Zipline, and each provides a different level of access to the study. Review the Managing Study Access table for a summary of the different user roles and step by step directions on making the changes in Zipline.
Make Changes to Your Study:
Exempt Research: Some changes always require HSD to review a modification and make re-determination of exempt status. Many other changes do not. Review the exempt research guidance for more information.
IRB Reviewed Research: Submit a modification to your application. The modification must be approved by the IRB before you make the change. There are two types of modifications in Zipline:
Zipline does not allow more than one open modification of each type at a time. Review the resources below for more information.
Resources:
Report to the IRB:
Regulations require certain information to be reported to the IRB, including information about new or increased risk to subjects and problems that have occurred, such as data breaches resulting from a stolen laptop.
Consult HSD’s Report Safety/Compliance Information for more information about what needs to be reported, the timeline for reporting, and how to report.
Send an email to hsdreprt@uw.edu if you have questions or need help.
Renew IRB Approval (if required):
Your IRB approval letter will tell you if an annual re-review, called continuing review, is required for your study. Most expedited studies do not require continuing review, while studies reviewed by the full board are more likely to require continuing review.
Review Renew Your IRB Approval for more information.
Close IRB Application:
Submit a continuing review to close your IRB application when your human subjects research is complete. Applications may be closed when: