The lead or coordinating site is usually the institution that receives the grant or contract directly from a funding agency and then establishes subawards or subcontracts with the participating sites. The lead PI is the PI in whose name the overall grant application was submitted to the funding agency and who is responsible for overall management and coordination of the study across all participating sites. If there is no clear lead site or PI identified as part of the funding structure, it will be important to identify which site will serve as the lead for the role of coordinating single IRB (sIRB) review responsibilities. The lead has specific responsibilities related to the sIRB, described below.
For federally-funded studies subject to the single IRB requirement, the lead PI should:
Consult with HSD about selecting the sIRB prior to submitting the funding application. HSD recommends that you do this prior to obtaining confirmation from participating sites about their willingness to rely on the selected sIRB. HSD cannot guarantee its willingness to support the use of a non-UW sIRB that has been selected or the use of the UW IRB as the sIRB without its consultation and approval.
After assessing the acceptability of the proposed IRB, HSD will typically provide the UW investigator with a letter of support. This should be retained for study records. If desired, a copy can be included in the grant proposal.
If your funding commitment includes the involvement of non-UW institutions (for example, Seattle Children’s or Fred Hutch) in obtaining consent, collecting identifiable data from research participants or conducting research procedures, each of these organizations will need to agree to the sIRB arrangement and to provide their own confirmation of the agreement.
When the grant is awarded study set-up requires formally establishing the sIRB arrangement as well as setting up the personnel and structure for handling the lead site responsibilities.