UW is a Participating Site
A participating site in multi-institutional research is typically under the control of a local investigator at that institution. The local investigator (also called the participating site investigator) is responsible for overseeing study activities at that location. Participating sites may receive subawards or subcontracts from the lead institution or they may receive their own award directly from a federal agency. Under single IRB (sIRB), the participating site will typically rely on the IRB review of the IRB at lead site or another IRB selected by the lead study PI. The responsibilities of a participating site under sIRB review vary with each study phase.
Grant or contract application
The lead study PI is typically responsible for selecting the sIRB and communicating any required information about the sIRB to any funding agencies as part of the grant or contract application. If there is not a lead study PI, the PIs at the sites will need to work together to identify the sIRB.
Although it is the responsibility of the PI(s) to identify which institution will serve as the sIRB, HSD is the only office at the UW that is authorized to commit the UW to relying on a non-UW IRB. Therefore, HSD strongly recommends that UW PIs obtain confirmation from HSD that UW can rely on the selected sIRB at the time a funding proposal is submitted to the agency in order to avoid delays at the time of funding. HSD cannot guarantee that UW can rely on other IRBs if HSD has not been consulted in advance.
UW Requirements and Process
Contact HSD at least one week in advance of the funding submission deadline to request confirmation that the UW is willing to rely on the sIRB selected by the lead site. To make the request, email the following information to email@example.com.
- The name of the UW site investigator (site PI)
- The name of the lead PI and the lead site
- The organization that will serve as the sIRB
- The title of the study/funding proposal
- A brief description of the study (can attach a protocol or draft portions of the grant proposal)
- The funding application deadline
- A copy of or link to the Request for Applications (RFA) or Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)
- What role(s) the UW will play in the research (attach a draft scope of work if available)
- Whether this request is for a single study, multiple studies and/or a network that will design and conduct studies
After assessing the acceptability of the proposed IRB, HSD will typically provide the UW participating site investigator with a letter of support. This should be provided to the lead PI and retained for study records.
If your funding commitment includes the involvement of non-UW, institutions or organizations (for example, Seattle Children’s or Fred Hutch) in obtaining consent, collecting identifiable data from research participants or conducting research procedures, each of these organizations will also need to agree to the sIRB arrangement.
Study set up
The sIRB Reliance Agreement Process
HSD’s letter of support for the funding application is not an IRB reliance agreement. After the grant is awarded or as part of Just-in-Time, HSD must negotiate and sign a formal written agreement with the sIRB and communicate information to the sIRB about the role of UW in the study. The reliance agreement documents the arrangement and establishes expectations about communication, reporting, and procedures. HSD is the only office authorized to do this on behalf of UW researchers.
UW already has several established reliance agreements with other institutions. This does not mean that the reliance agreement process is completed. A short, study-specific acknowledgement is usually required – but it can be accomplished quickly when HSD has all of the necessary information.
How to Initiate the Reliance Agreement Process
Follow the instructions to Ask for Non-UW IRB using Zipline. As part of your submission you will need to provide a copy of the protocol, template consent materials and any documents you receive from the reviewing IRB that are to be filled out by the UW IRB office (sometimes called the HRPP office). You may need to contact the reviewing IRB or lead site in order to obtain these. You should initiate the reliance agreement process in Zipline after you have all of these documents.
Local Context Information for the sIRB
Local context information is information about state laws and mandatory UW policies that is important for the sIRB to know when it reviews the UW site. For example, Washington State laws affect the elements that must be included in a HIPAA authorization form for access to healthcare records as well as the age at which individuals under the age of 18 are considered able to consent to research (i.e., without requiring parental permission).
There is currently no national standardization or consistency in what and how local context information is provided to sIRBs. If the lead site, coordinating center, or sIRB asks you for local context information (for example, by sending you a form or webpage to complete), contact HSD at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Address Other Regulatory Issues
The sIRB (or coordinating center or lead site) may require you to provide documentation related to other regulatory requirements, if they are relevant to the research and its IRB review. This is the responsibility of the UW researcher, not HSD. Examples include:
- Any relevant Financial Conflict of Interest Management Plan
- Documentation of completed human subjects training for all key personnel
- Documentation of completed GCP (Good Clinical Practice) training for all key personnel
- Radiation Safety approval
- Institutional Biosafety (IBC) approval
Apply for IRB Approval
Each participating site must apply for the approval of the sIRB. There is currently no national standardization or consistency regarding who prepares and submits the IRB application for each participating site – it could be the local PI (you), the lead site, or the coordinating center. The lead site or coordinating center will inform you:
- Who should prepare and submit the IRB application on behalf of the UW site
- If it is you: what application forms and submission system you should use
- If it is not you: what information you will need to provide to the individuals preparing the application for the UW site
During the study
The UW participating site PI is responsible for following the policies of the sIRB. This includes using the sIRB forms and processes (or assisting the lead site with them), following the sIRB reporting requirements about unanticipated problems and other issues, and complying with the stipulations of the sIRB’s approval.
UW participating site PIs are also responsible for:
- Providing HSD with a copy of the sIRB’s approval for the UW site via email at email@example.com.
- Ensuring that any relevant financial conflicts of interest are disclosed to the sIRB and that conflict of interest management plans issued by the Office of Research are given to the sIRB.
- Obtaining any required ancillary reviews and approvals and providing the results of these reviews to the sIRB if requested.
- Making copies of sIRB approvals available for inspection by monitors and auditors.
See the External IRB Checklist for UW Researchers for a detailed list of responsibilities.