Skip to content
News and updates

News and updates

GOP Senate Agenda Complicated by Recent Changes

Posted on

As a lengthy August recess approaches, recent changes are leaving Republicans, who were already dealing with a narrow Senate majority, two votes short on the Appropriations Committee.

The sudden death of Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) late Saturday night leaves a vacancy in the powerful Senate Budget Committee. As Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, Graham played a major role in drafting budget resolutions and reconciliation bills, including last year’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” and recent immigration enforcement package. His death complicates the plans of House Republican leaders to push through another reconciliation package. Graham also served as chairman of the State-Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster will appoint a temporary replacement to serve out the rest of Graham’s term. Graham, who was up for reelection, was set to face Democrat Annie Andrews in November. An August 11 special primary election will determine the new Republican nominee.

Chair of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is also absent from Congress, having spent the last several weeks in the hospital following a medical emergency. His sudden departure and relative silence from his office have caused widespread speculation over his condition, including from Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, who sent him a letter last week urging a transparent status update on his condition and ability to continue holding office. Last night, McConnell released a statement that said he was recovering at a rehabilitation center after losing consciousness from a fall, and a case of pneumonia. His continued absence has forced Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-ME) to postpone FY27 fiscal markups yet again. Republicans have a one-seat margin on the Senate Appropriations Committee and will not be able to advance any spending bills even along party lines without full attendance.

Sen. Collins Asks OMB to Withdraw Parts of Grant Rule, Extend Comment Period

Posted on

Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, sent a letter yesterday to White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, asking him to extend the comment deadline for OMB’s proposed revisions to Uniform Guidance by 45 days and to withdraw portions of the rule. Collins specifically objected to the following provisions:

  • Allowing federal agencies to terminate discretionary grants at any time without an appeal process opportunity
  • Requiring senior political appointees to approve grants, noting “this additional review for awards that have already been selected through a scientific, merit-based peer review process would undermine the objective that the Federal government fund scientific and biomedical research projects based on scientific merit and value, rather than political ideology.”
  • Requiring agencies to consider the president’s policy priorities when administering grants, Collins argued that the proposed rule fails to “ensure that consideration of the President’s policy priorities does not supersede congressional intent for the administration of these awards.”

In her letter, Collins asked OMB to withdraw these provisions, among others, and to extend the comment deadline to 90 days.

Proposed Uniform Guidance Changes

Posted on

On May 29, 2026, the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a proposed rule in the Federal Register that would substantially revise 2 C.F.R. Part 200, commonly referred to as the “Uniform Guidance”, which applies to federal grants, cooperative agreements and other types of federal assistance funding.

If finalized, the proposed rule would significantly impact federal awards, including requiring political appointee review of grant decisions, restrictions on who applicants may work with, expanded rights the federal government has in modifying or terminating awards, and much more. Because these changes have significant implications for federally funded research, the University and UW Medicine are compiling an institutional response to the federal government. 

Please use the University’s “Uniform Guidance – Proposed Changes” form (UW NetID required) to provide your comments to University leadership to support the University’s official response to OMB. Your feedback and examples of impacts will inform our official UW response, and comments are still being accepted.

As a member of the public, you may also comment directly to OMB; however, OMB will consider only one comment per institution. Therefore, if you choose to submit comments to OMB in an individual capacity, you should state your experience generically (e.g. a faculty member in at a large public university) but do not mention your affiliation with the University of Washington.

Additional analysis from APLU can be found here: Summary of Uniform Guidance Issues.

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship

Posted on

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s executive order declaring that children born in the US are not American citizens if their parents were here illegally or temporarily.

“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, “We keep that promise today.”

Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorusch, and Samuel Alito dissented. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the court’s majority to strike down the executive order but said he based his decision on a federal law, not the Constitution. Back in April, Trump attended the oral arguments for this case, Trump v. Barbara, becoming the first sitting president ever to do so. The Court was expected to uphold birthright citizenship, but the final ruling was closer than predicted, with most expecting a 7-2 ruling.

The decision is one of several key rulings released over the past week:

  • In a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld state laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on school athletic teams, ruling that state bans in Idaho and West Virginia don’t violate the Constitution or Title IX.
  • In a 6-3 decision, the Court expanded the power of the executive branch to fire independent regulators, with the notable exception of members of the Federal Reserve. Despite allowing Fed governor Lisa Cook to stay in her role, this ruling increases the power of the president to fire agency heads at will.
  • In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld Mississippi’s grace period for late mail-in ballots, rejecting Trump’s persistent attempts to invalidate ballots arriving after Election Day. This ruling is significant for protecting mail-in voting across 2026 battleground districts. Over half of states permit mailed ballots to be counted a certain number of days after the election, if they are postmarked by Election Day.
  • In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court erased party spending limits in federal elections, striking down a federal election law more than 50 years old.
  • Also in a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled the Trump administration may end legal protections for migrants fleeing violence in Haiti and Syria, allowing DHS to end the temporary protected status program.

Judge Freezes Trump Rule Limiting Graduate Student Loan Access

Posted on

Late Wednesday night, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from implementing a new rule that would cap federal student loans for graduate students. The new rule was set to take effect on July 1. U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell sided with eight trade organizations, including the American Association of Nurse Practitioners and the PA Education Association, who brought the suit against the Education Department.

The Education Department published the rule on May 1, attempting to implement the federal student loan changes that were part of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This included eliminating Grad PLUS loans, and setting loan limits for graduate/professional degrees, as well as altering the regulatory definition of what is considered “a professional degree” to only cover certain degrees in 11 fields.

The preliminary injunction applies to this definition of professional degrees component, and as of now, the July 1 deadline for the new caps is blocked.