Skip to content

Senate Moves Forward on Budget

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Michael Enzi (R-WY) filed a budget motion in the Senate today to establish discretionary spending topline numbers, known as 302(b)s for FY2017. The move allows appropriations work to begin in earnest as the Seante prepares to take up its Energy-Water measure (S 2804) this week.

Enzi set the budget limits at $551 billion for defense spending and $518.5 billion for nondefense spending, equal to the caps enacted under last year’s bipartisan budget deal. The agreement provided for Enzi to file the toplines between April 15 and May 15 in the absence of a budget resolution, though Enzi has not ruled out considering a complete budget measure later in the year.

Busy Week for Appropriators

House and Senate Appropriations committees show no signs of slowing down as both committees announced their intended  schedules for the week. The Senate Appropriations Committee has announced subcommittee and full committee markup of FY 2017 Commerce, Science and Justice Appropriations bill, which funds federal research agencies including the National Science Foundation and NASA. Also hearings have been announced for the Senate Appropriations Interior Subcommittee will hold a hearing on EPA, and Defense Subcommittee hearing on innovation and research.

The House Appropriations Committee has announced full committee markups of the FY 2017 Agriculture and Energy & Water bills, which went through subcommittee markup last week, as well as discretionary allocations.

Meanwhile, there is no clarity in the House as to when a FY 2017 Budget maybe expected, despite the statutory deadline being last Friday. 

Appropriators Move Forward

Appropriators from both chambers of Congress advanced several of the annual spending bills needed to finance government agencies for the fiscal year that begins the first of October, but plenty of roadblocks could derail the process at any time. That includes the fact that Republican House leaders say they’re not giving up on getting a budget resolution adopted, even with the statutory deadline fast approaching on Friday and their party’s conservative bloc showing no signs of yielding to the higher levels of the last budget agreement. The House is expected to give itself an extension on the budget deadline, since no agreement has been reached. 

The House Appropriations Committee approved by voice vote their Military Construction-VA bill, while two of its subcommittees advanced the Agriculture and Energy & Water bills. Similarly, the Senate, which normally waits on House-passed bills, is acting quickly on its own versions of FY 2017 measures. Thursday, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up its own versions of the Military Construction-VA and Energy & Water bills, which were approved by its subcommittees Wednesday. The Senate is expected to consider its FY 2017 Energy-Water bill on the floor next week. 

House Budget Rolls On

The House Budget Committee released their FY 2017 budget resolution Tuesday to win support from dissident conservatives through a combination of assumed cuts in mandatory spending programs and new budget rules.

The House Budget outlines the Congressional tax and spending framework, which does not go to the president and does not become a law. The purpose of the budget is to lay out a path for Congress to balance the budget in 10 years by cutting spending by $6.5 trillion. Combined with projected savings from (the controversial) dynamic scoring estimates of the impact of repealing Obamacare and overall deficit reduction, the budget would save $7 trillion over a decade, according to the House Budget Committee documents.

The budget stays with the FY 2017 discretionary spending caps from last year’s budget deal, which are $551 billion for defense and $518.5 billion for nondefense, it assumes defense spending will rise and nondefense spending will be reduced in relation to the statutory spending caps and inflation over the subsequent nine years.

Members of the Freedom Caucus already have dismissed the mandatory program cuts because there is no guarantee — in fact it is unlikely — they would get through the Senate and be signed by President Barack Obama. Also controversial is that the House budget uses the higher numbers from the recent budget agreement and not the lower, BCA/Sequester numbers agreed to several years ago.

But the proposed budget offers another avenue to potential support. Since it is not a law, a budget resolution can only assume that certain policies are enacted.

It will be marked up by the panel at Wednesday morning, despite continuing uncertainty over the plan’s fate on the House Floor given opposition by House Freedom Caucus conservatives who agreed Monday night to come out in opposition.

Read the budget proposal here. 

See as summary of the budget here. 

Charts and graphs outlining the budget are here. 

A budget FAQ is here.