Skip to content

Sitting Speaker Removed During Session for First Time

The House of Representatives is, as of this afternoon, now navigating through truly uncharted territory as Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) was removed from the Speakership by a vote of 216 to 210.  After a procedural vote to prevent the motion to remove McCarthy was defeated, in the end, seven other Republicans voted with Matt Gaetz and all Democrats to remove him from the Speakership.

The House must now regroup and pick a new Speaker.  Whether there is a logical successor remains to be seen.  Whether McCarthy runs to reclaim the spot is also unknown.  These are just two of the myriad questions about where we go from here.

Read more about the historic developments here, here, and here

CR Leads to Vote on Speaker Removal

So… as the House made a last-minute move to avoid a government shutdown over the weekend, it has led to a vote scheduled for this afternoon that could see the House Speaker removed, in essence, by members of his own party.

Hard-right member Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who has made it clear since January– when it took 15 rounds of voting to elect Kevin McCarthy of California as Speaker– that he has been unhappy with McCarthy, used as his final justification the continuing resolution and the supposed negotiations around it to file a motion to remove the Speaker late yesterday.  The House is scheduled vote on that motion this afternoon.  Gaetz has been the most public and vociferous of a group of hard-core right-wing members of the House Republican conference that has sought concessions from the Speaker since the beginning of this Congress.  Apparently, at least for him, the CR was the last straw.

A House Speaker has never been removed during a session and numerous questions abound about how things might unfold:

  • Will a “motion to table” the vote– or kill the motion– before there is an actual vote on the motion succeed?
  • If there is an actual floor vote, how many Republicans will join Gaetz in voting to remove McCarthy?
  • It’s clear that the vast majority of the Republican conference supports McCarthy.  Will Democrats help McCarthy in anyway to stay in power?
  • Who would replace McCarthy?

These are only a handful of questions that will be answered relatively shortly.

Read more about the situation here, here, and here.

 

Shutdown Averted… For Now?

Not quite at the literal 11th hour– but close to it– the federal government managed to avoid having to shut itself down last Saturday evening over the lack of funds to continue operating.  The dreaded government shutdown– something that most of Washington had been expecting for the past two weeks– was prevented at the end as a continuing resolution (CR) to keep the government funded through November 17 was adopted in both chambers on bipartisan votes and signed into law at the last minute.

There was plenty of drama building up to the last-minute, temporary, funding extension.  After the House Republican leadership finally acknowledged early Saturday that it did not have the votes within its conference to pass a bill with only Republican votes due to the recalcitrance of some of the the hard-right members, the Speaker sought to bring to the floor a CR that was relatively “clean.”  It extended government funding at this year’s current levels through November 17, extended the authority of the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Flood Insurance Program, and included $16 billion in emergency disaster relief.  It did not include, something that would prove to be an issue in the Senate later that day, additional funding for efforts in Ukraine.  The package that was being brought to the floor caught the House Democrats by surprise.

Ultimately, after a review of the package to ensure that there were no “poison pills” for their party in the legislation, all but one House Democrat joined a majority of the House Republicans in approving the measure.  Ninety House Republicans voted against the bill.

When the Senate took up the House-passed the bill shortly afterwards, progress was delayed because of the lack of additional funding for Ukraine.  After assurances from the Senate leadership that efforts would be made on this front, the hold on the legislation from Michael Bennet (D-CO) was released and the chamber adopted it 88 to 9.  It was signed into law by President Biden before the end of the evening.

The extension of government funding through November 17 buys, in theory, additional time for the lawmakers to actually finish additional parts of the annual appropriations process.  None of the 12 annual appropriations bills for FY2024 has been signed into law yet.

All of these activities related to the CR has ultimately led to another set of dramatic activities currently playing out in the House this week, which we discuss in the next post.

 

Sen. Appropriations Committee Finishes Its Work, Clears Last 4 Bills

By clearing the last four bills yesterday, the Senate Appropriations Committee has reported out all 12 spending bills for a fiscal year for the first time in five years.  The committee reported out favorably yesterday the following FY2024 spending measures:  Labor-HHS-Education; Defense; Interior and the Environment; and Homeland Security.  Unlike the situation in the House, where the leadership had to pull the Agriculture spending bill from a floor vote because it lacked enough support even among the Republicans, the committee process in the Senate yesterday was very bipartisan.  The Interior bill passed by a vote of 28 – 0, the Defense bill was approved 27 – 1, the Labor-HHS bill was adopted 26 – 2, and the vote was 24 – 4 on the Homeland Security legislation.  

Labor-HHS-Education

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

  • NIH

The Senate legislation would fund the National Institutes of Health at a total of $47.8 billion, an increase of $943 million above the current level.  The total includes $1.5 billion for ARPA-H, which represents level funding under the Senate version of the bill.  Within the NIH, the bill would increase, among other programs, mental health and Alzheimer’s research by $100 million each and while cancer research would see an increase of $60 million.

  • Title VII Health Professions and Title VIII Nursing Programs

The legislation proposes to fund the Title VII Health Professions programs at a total of $529 million, an increase of $20 million.

At the same time, the Title VIII Nursing programs would see a total of $302.5 million, a $2-million increase over this year.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

  • Student Aid and Higher Education
    • Pell Grant– The maximum award would increase by $250 to $7,645
    • SEOG– $900 million (a decrease of $10 million)
    • Federal Work Study– $1.22 billion (a decrease of $10 million)
    • International Education– $85.7 million (level funded)
    • TRIO– $1.19 billion (level funded)
    • GEAR UP– $338 million (level funded)
    • GAANN– $23.5 million (level funded)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (IES)
    • IES would be funded at $793 million, a cut of $14.5 million

Interior

USGS

  • Climate Adaptation Science Centers– $63.1 million (level funded)
  • ShakeAlert– $29.6 million (level funded)

NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES

  • $207 million (level funded)

Defense

Under the committee-approved bill, defense basic research would be see an increase of 10.5 percent for a total of $3.22 billion.

  • Army basic research:  $672.5 million (an increase of 5.8%)
  • Navy basic research:  $793.5 million (an increase of 15.2%)
  • Air Force basic research:  $711.9 million (an increase of 16.3%)
  • Defense-wide basic research:  $862.3 million (a decrease of 7.0%)
  • DARPA:  $4.1 billion (0.7% increase)

Both chambers are now in recess until after Labor Day. 

SCOTUS Rejects Loan Forgiveness Plan

Following up on yesterday’s ruling on ending explicit use of race in admissions, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down earlier today the Biden Administration’s loan cancellation proposal.  In a 6 – 3 decision, the court’s majority ruled that the Education Department did not have the authority to cancel loans.  The decision is available here.  

You can read more about the decision here, here, and here