Skip to content

House Proposes Deep FY11 Cuts, President Looks to FY12

The leadership of the House of Representatives has come forward with a second version of proposed cuts for fiscal year 2011. The new continuing resolution (CR) proposal is in response to criticism from deficit hawks within the Republican caucus who seek to fulfill a 2010 promise to reduce federal spending by $100 billion from what the President has put forward. The proposed CR cuts would be particularly significant, given that they would be spread over the remaining 7 months of FY11 as opposed to over an entire fiscal year. The House proposal cuts nearly all federal research agencies including: NIH, NSF, and DoE Office of Science. Additionally, Pell Grant levels would see a reduction of approximately 15%.

Details on select agencies/programs within House FY11 proposal:

National Institutes of Health- NIH would be cut by $1.63 billion, or 5.3%, below the FY10 level of $31.01 billion.

National Science Foundation-  NSF would be cut by $359.5 million, or 5.2%, below the FY10 level of $6.87 billion.  The proposal appropriates $5.4 billion for Research and Related Activities, which is $150 million, or 2.7%, below the FY 10 level.  For Education and Human Resources, the bill appropriates $725.7 million, which is $147 million, or 16.4%, below the FY 10 funding level.  For Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC), the CR appropriates $54 million, which is $63 million, or 53%, below the FY10 level. The MREFC account funds the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) that UW partners on. OOI represents the largest single federal award to the UW.

Department of Energy-  DOE’s Office of Science would be funded at $4.02 billion, representing a cut of $886 million, or 18%, from the FY10 funding level of $4.90 billion. $50 million is included to sustain the new Advanced Research Projects Agency -Energy.

National Institute of Standards and Technology-  NIST would see a reduction in its overall budget of $159.5 million, or 19%, from its FY 2010 funding level of $856.6 million. The university facilities construction account within NIST is eliminated.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration-  NASA would be cut by $578.7 million, or 3.1%, below the FY10 amount of $18.7 billion.  However, NASA Science would receive $4.4 billion, Aeronautics $501 million, and Education $182 million – all the same as FY10. 

Department of Education-  Funding is not included in the House proposal to fill the Pell Grant shortfall, which means a cut of $845 from the discretionary maximum grant of $4,860 down to $4,015. With the mandatory funding, the maximum grant would total $4,705, compared to the current maximum grant for the academic year 2011-12 of $5,550. The proposal cuts funding for TRIO and GEAR UP by $24.9 million and $19.8 million, respectively, to below their FY08 levels. In addition, the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) program for undergraduates with exceptional financial need was proposed for elimination, as was the Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP) Program that establishes a federal-state partnership to provide financial assistance in the form of grants to students who have demonstrated financial need.

National Endowment for the Humanities- NEH would be cut by $22 million, from its FY10 level of $167 million to $145 million, a reduction of 13.2%.

A vigorous defense of investments in these programs is taking place in Washington, DC. The Senate and President are expected to challenge the House proposal. Meanwhile, today, President Obama released his FY12 budget request. Although the request makes cuts to federal spending, increases to several research agencies are included within the proposal as well as well as a reorganization of the Pell Grant program that would keep the current maximum award level of $5,550. The President’s budget request largely assumes level funding for FY11, which at this juncture, is probably a best case scenario. Additional details on the FY12 budget request will be provided shortly.

House Appropriations Releases List of Proposed Reductions

Today, the House Appropriations Committee released a list of 70 agencies/programs targeted for reductions from the President’s FY11 budget request. The list contains several agencies of importance to the higher education community, including:

  • National Institutes of Health:  $1 billion below President’s request (level-funded when compared to FY2010)
  • National Science Foundation:  $139 million below President’s request (an increase of approximately $360 million over FY2010)
  • Department of Energy, Office of Science:  $1.1 billion below President’s request (approximately $900 below FY2010)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:  $336 million below President’s request (an increase of $481 million above FY2010)
  • U.S. Geological Survey:  $27 million below President’s request (level funded when compared to FY2010)
  • National Endowment for the Humanities:  $6 million below President’s request each ($14 million below FY2010)
  • DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy:  $899 million below President’s request
  • Agricultural Research:  $246 million below President’s request

The cuts proposed by the House will eventually need to be reconciled with figures put forward in the Senate. As a result, the closeout of the FY11 appropriations process remains fluid.

Full List of House Appropriations’ Proposed Reductions

Congress Works to Finalize FY11 Budget

The Republican effort to roll back non-security discretionary spending to FY08 levels officially gets started this week with the return of House lawmakers from their one-week recess.  On Tuesday, House Republicans will set their new, enforceable spending limits for FY11, and later in the week unveil their package to cut spending for the remainder of the year.  House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) announced last week that the new discretionary spending cap will represent a $32 billion reduction from the annualized spending level under the stopgap continuing resolution (CR) currently funding federal government. This proposed cap assumes a $41 billion reduction in non-security spending (i.e., programs other than defense, homeland security, and veterans), while providing a nominal increase for security spending.  The new cap is intended to reduce non-security spending to FY08 levels for the final seven months of the current fiscal year (FY11). The current CR expires March 4th.

Also this week, the House Appropriations Committee plan to adopt spending allocations for each of the 12 individual funding bills for FY11, which determine the level of cuts each domestic spending bill will incur.  GOP appropriators have been working for weeks to identify specific program cuts for each bill. We expect to see a draft of the CR extension that will reflect those spending cuts, in preparation for House floor action on the measure next week. No committee markup of the legislation is expected, and GOP leaders haven’t yet announced whether a full Defense spending will be considered. Analysis of the proposed spending caps show that while on average non-security spending for the remainder of the fiscal year would be cut by more than 15 percent, discretionary spending for some bills would be cut much more deeply. Transportation-HUD programs, for instance, face a 26 percent cut, with Agriculture to be cut 24 percent, and Energy-Water cut 20 percent.

The Office of Federal Relations continues to advocate for maintaining federal funding at the FY10 level, with some targeted investments in research.  While the House is likely to agree to drastic cuts for FY11, the Senate – controlled by the Democrats – will not agree to such severe cuts.  It is not yet clear where we will end up but it looks like we may see the remainder of FY11 funded at levels somewhere between FY09 and FY10.  Stay tuned…

Senate Joins Earmark Moratorium

Yesterday, Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-HI) announced that the Senate will not advance earmark requests during the FY11 and FY12 appropriations cycles. The annoumcement follows decisions by the House of Representatives and President Obama to oppose the inclusion of special member projects in appropriations bills. Senator Inouye’s statement affirms his belief that Members of Congress should be able to direct spending in support of meritorious constituent projects and commits to reviewing the earmark process so that improvements can be made.

Full Statement