Skip to content

The UW’s Community College Research Initiatives receives $449,535 grant to increase rural educational equity

The University of Washington’s Community College Research Initiatives announced that it received a $449,535 grant from Ascendium Education Group for research to increase rural learner success. 

Community College Research Initiatives (CCRI) conducts research to facilitate the advancement of equity in higher education. Ascendium invests in research that helps to build a body of evidence about how to ensure rural learners from low-income backgrounds can achieve their postsecondary education and career goals. Ascendium expects this investment in CCRI’s research will catalyze action affecting policies and practices grounded in high-quality evidence and research

The CCRI project will address mentorship program gaps through a multisite, three-stage study of mentorship programs at public rural community colleges across the United States. Drawing upon institutional websites, in-depth interviews and student survey responses, this project will benefit both scholars and practitioners by producing a database of mentoring strategies at rural community colleges. 

“We at CCRI are excited for the opportunity to learn how rural two-year institutions across the country are supporting students from low-income backgrounds with mentorship programs,” shared CCRI director, Lia Wetzstein, Ph.D. The CCRI data will advance the understanding of how the evidence-based solution of mentoring is being implemented at rural colleges while gauging the student experience with a primary focus on students from low-income backgrounds and racially minoritized students. 

“We are grateful to Ascendium Education Group for their support,” Wetzstein continued. Ascendium is interested in generating evidence about practices and programs that increase the completion of high-quality postsecondary education and training and successful transition to high-quality jobs. Through the CCRI analysis of the nationwide landscape of rural community college mentorship and mentorship experiences, this project will produce models of mentorship to specifically address the rural community college context and rural students’ experience. 

Last year CCRI was awarded a $1.2 million grant from Ascendium to work toward equity in STEM education for low-income learners across Washington state. CCRI, a program within Undergraduate Academic Affairs at the UW, is an influential contributor in community college and transfer partnership research identifying strategies that help students transfer to four-year institutions and complete their bachelor’s degrees. To learn more about CCRI, visit https://www.washington.edu/ccri/.

Ascendium Education Group is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to helping people reach the education and career goals that matter to them. Ascendium invests in initiatives designed to increase the number of students from low-income backgrounds who complete postsecondary degrees, certificates and workforce training programs, with an emphasis on first-generation students, incarcerated adults, rural community members, students of color and veterans. Ascendium’s work identifies, validates and expands best practices to promote large-scale change at the institutional, system and state levels, with the intention of elevating opportunity for all. For more information, visit https://www.ascendiumphilanthropy.org

For more information or to get involved, contact CCRI, ccri@uw.edu

Institutional coaching publication in New Directions for Community Colleges

CCRI (Community College Research Initiatives) had the privilege of working for several years with Student Success Center (SSC) partners and Jobs for the Future (JFF) on coaching programs to facilitate institutional change. The result of that work was several briefs and tools to support coaching and state coaching programs. A recent article, authored by Jennifer Miller (NY SSC), Lia Wetzstein (CCRI), and Amy Girardi (formerly JFF) in New Directions for Community Colleges titled Creating a culture of student success innovation through institutional coaching, discusses this work. It describes how coaches support institutional reform efforts, the history of coaching support of guided pathways implementation, and how CCRI supported the Student Success Center Network Coaching Program. 

The article discusses the multiple ways coaching supported institutional leaders’ change efforts. These include coaches being resource hubs by providing information, strategies, and professional development; fostering collaboration; providing external perspectives; moving ideas into actions with knowledge of best practices; and being thought partners (p. 85). It also shares resources that exist for coach professional development and different state examples of how coaches are trained and utilized. 

We invite you to use this shareable link to access a free copy available to the first 100! https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/author/BKIGTXWA5WYXPIHAEFUP?target=10.1002/cc.20562 

This link to the article gives access to the abstract and to access a paid copy: https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20562.

Twitter chat summary on racial equity & coaching for college reform

So what happened?

On June 10, 2020, we facilitated a Twitter chat on how organizations and coaches of higher education reform are embracing transformative change centered on racial justice and as we continue to engage in this and student success work during these unprecedented times, we invite you to read and utilize our collection of equity-minded coaching briefs and tools in your change efforts using a racial equity lens.

Brief: Coaching for More Equitable Student Outcomes
Brief: Integrating Racial Equity into Guided Pathways
The Equity Tool Guide gives an overview of the six equity-minded coaching tools.

We are excited to provide a short summary of the chat below and appreciate all the participants from around the country who contributed to this conversation. We are especially grateful to the many partners and colleagues who helped lead this chat as well as those who spent their time to prepare. 

Thank you! @johnm2783, @Jazzyjpenn, @Lili_Castille, @kmwb2005, @KandiBauman, @PresidentBaston, @CoxBrand, @EQUITYLEADER, @scholarteaching, @PJHanley20, @real_stallone, @FLCollegeSystem, @MCCACSS.

What did we talk about?

We prepared a number of questions for the chat that prompted great discussions! Here are some of the responses that stood out to us from participants.

Response from @FLcollegesystem

The @FLCollegeSystem understands that transformative change is needed. We are providing our #comm_colleges with important data that they can use to identify access & achievement inequities so that gaps can be identified, and they can begin formulating solutions.

The @FLCollegeSystem #guidedpathways institute will then support our #comm_colleges in identifying concrete steps to creating a solution to the equity barriers within the system, and allow for all students to have equal access to a world-class education.

Response from @mccacss

@MIColleges have decided they can no longer settle for incremental change on issues of equity and social justice and are signing a strongly worded statement that centers these issues with explicit action rather than implicit rhetoric for #mistudentsuccess.

Response from @jfftweets

JFF is starting internally. You can’t help others if your own house isn’t in order. We are redesigning hiring and onboarding, looking at internal staffing structures, and expanding our recruitment networks.

Response from @lili_castille

In the form of 5 year institutional #Equity Plans which will be published next month. The plans detail what the college/uni will do to address longstanding structural issues across the institution from the classroom to financial aid to student supports

Developing/implementing these equity plans requires ongoing, difficult conversations and the ability to evaluate what works and take action. It is many 1% solutions and incremental changes that add up to a more equitable institution for all students.

Response from @VLundyWagner

I work to remind colleagues that there is work to do together and on your own professionally, and work to do privately. Helping staff understand that all POC are not experts on facilitating racial dialogue because they are POC is important for #highered #edequity

Response from @presidentbaston

RCC held two Black Lives Matter panel discussions – one with Black students and another with Black employees. Black voices have been benignly neglected but are being elevated so we can do our work in building an institution that fosters inclusive excellence.

The challenge for many institutions in addressing dialogues on racial justice really centers around where to begin the conversation. These conversations will require courage, consistency, commitment, and most importantly the right start.

Response from @maevekatherine

@CalCommColleges call to action: “Campus leaders must host open dialogue and address campus climate.” Our #regionalcoordinator #coaches are listening deeply and bringing resources forward to nourish critical conversations!

Call to action: “Campuses must audit classroom climate and create an action plan to create inclusive classrooms and anti-racism curriculum.”

CCCCO call to action: “Shorten the time frame for the full implementation of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Integration Plan.”

CCCCO call to action: “Join and engage in the Vision Resource Center “Community Colleges for Change.”

Response from @johnm2783

We held an Open Conversation on BLM w students & faculty, Dr. Marilyn Maye, coauthor of Seven Sisters and a Brother: Friendship, Resistance, and Untold Truths Behind Black St. Activism shared thoughts on Black student activism, BLM, and Leadership in a time of change

Institutional coaches can serve in multiple roles in facilitating this work. They serve educators and models, as well as an accountability function that some work is being done.

Response from @wagnerrobertsk

Program by program, President conversations.  This is a new and concerted effort.  Our System President has shared Five Commitments to Progress for us to work under and progress with.

Being an institutional coach is a HUGE job that is really going to require the ability to field extreme feelings and actions from a variety of opinions/sides.  Support and understanding will be needed for all involved.

Response from @jfftweets

We are holding space for conversations, including affinity coaching groups, and looking at all of our programing including our coaching work to ensure we are designing and delivering with an equity lens, and providing our stakeholders space to center equity.

Response from @kmwb2005

We have so much work to do here… we have an amazing colleague, Ha Nguyen, who is facilitating dialogues with college student leaders and we are building a Guided Pathways Student Advisory Council…

Response from @jfftweets

What we hear from leaders in our networks is the need to diversify the leadership pipeline, so that administration mirrors the student body.

Response from @lili_castille

Creating open forums for dialogue and listening. One of our CC’s Black Student Alliance & Student Leadership Council hosted a forum entitled: Not A Moment But A Movement: A Forum on Privilege, America’s Subconscious Reality @CollegeDuPage

Response from @equityleader

We are facilitating wellness calls with our students. Many students have expressed mental health concerns regarding the civil unrest in our nation, COVID-19, and how this impacts their ability to perform academically.

Response from @jazzyjpenn

I am a Black women and higher education professional. My lived experiences have made me keenly aware of systemic racism. I work for an agency that supports leading with racial equity and makes sure that we are advancing educational opportunities for all students.

Response from @jmm_13

Coaches help to support difficult conversations on the #studentsuccess change process & can be very helpful when discussing equity issues & inclusive excellence

Response from @jfftweets

A success is having the data, but the challenge is understanding it enough to facilitate (ex. leading vs. lagging indicators) to facilitate changes in real time. Transformative change takes time and it’s easy to get impatient. Coaches can help maintain the momentum needed to make real changes in policy and practice.

Response from @maevekatherine

Proud of CA’s BIPOC leaders: new #communitycollege presidents & chancellors & at #UC! Worried about inequitable impacts of #COVID & economic depression on our communities, particularly BIPOC students. Sharing of approaches, partners, & curating resources appears 🔑

Response from @equityleader

We have seen success in our on-going efforts to create employee buy-in and a culture of equity-mindedness at our college. We are still challenged with defining equity and how to measure it.

Response from @jazzyjpenn

A success is that we are identifying and calling out inequities in policies and procedures. A challenge is old habits are hard to break, and people sometimes get weary discussing race and racism, so they look for the easy way around the work or avoid it altogether.

Response from @johnm2783…

Increase # of faculty of color!; Increase financial support for students of color (GA’s, TA’s,  scholarships, etc.); Too many leaders don’t believe that systemic injustices exist..Thought Leaders are critical in challenging this mindset that runs counter to all objective evidence that this is a real issue

Response from @jazzyjpenn

Accept that systemic racism is real; work like hell to dismantle it daily. Advocate for students of color by advancing racial equity-focused policies, promote racial equity-focused procedures and practices, fund equity-focused programs/educational opportunities.

Response from @kandibauman

Said best by my CCRI colleagues, there is a difference between being “for” racial equity and “about” racial equity. Addressing the impact of systemic injustice begins with re-centering our mission, resources, and measures of accountability to be about racial equity.

Response from @PJHanley

We have to direct resources to the most vulnerable students (that is what equity is about); not giving everyone the same.  Same goes for faculty and staff (in terms of prof dev, hiring pipelines, mentoring, etc)

Response from @equityleader

We must focus on laying the groundwork for institutions by providing on-going and mandatory professional development for all employees regarding equity and antiracism. We must focus on changing the system vs. changing the student; Moving from a deficit mindset to an equity mindset is imperative. Groundwork is heart work and employees must self-reflect in order to reframe our practices and ways of thinking.

* If you’d like to read more, here is the whole discussion for each question!

Resources Shared

Some participants went the extra mile and shared some resources! Check them out…

  • A FREE VIRTUAL Community College Showcase on July 28th. Tia McNair is one of the keynote presenters. Full program and registration info at https://t.co/LgYi6mCuDj?amp=1
  • @CalCommColleges call to action https://t.co/R6Oaih2vSI
  • Join the Rockland Community College community for a “Black Lives Matter RCC” panel discussion, featuring current students and alumni. RCC’s president https://t.co/M56ZJY0pho?amp=1
  • We are really proud of the diversity of our doctoral students in New Jersey City University’s Ed.D. in Community College Leadership. Check out student bios at njcu.edu/ccldoctorate

What did people think?

We sent a survey after the chat, and ⅔ of respondents said it was their first Twitter chat! If that was you, we appreciate that you tried something new with us in the Twitter-sphere!

We are happy to be able to offer a safe space where 75% of participants felt comfortable sharing their insights, opinions, and/or experiences. We hope to improve on this as we explore new ways to engage with you and other audiences that enjoy similar subjects. You can always email us at ccri@uw.edu with any specific feedback you may have!

100% of respondents found someone new to follow on Twitter, woohoo!

We asked what kind of subjects participants were interested in talking about in future chats and here are some responses…

  • State funding formulas
  • A student led conversation
  • Transfer
  • Leadership development
  • Coaching/mentoring
  • More about Equity!

Stay updated with us on Twitter or subscribe to our newsletter so you can take part in our next chat! @CCRI_UW, #CCRIchat

CCRI racial equity publications

As we continue to engage in racial justice and student success work during these unprecedented times, we invite you to read and utilize our collection of equity-minded coaching briefs and tools in your transformative change efforts using a racial equity lens.

Brief: Coaching for More Equitable Student Outcomes
Brief: Integrating Racial Equity into Guided Pathways
The Equity Tool Guide gives an overview of the six equity-minded coaching tools.

Our partner, Jobs for the Future (JFF) has recently posted CCRI’s briefs, tools and resource recommendations created on their Student Success Center Network Coaching Toolbox along with other useful coaching materials. JFF’s publication of this treasure trove of documents is timely as they emphasize the critical role of racial equity in reforming community college education. These resources are directed at coaches who work with community colleges to engage in transformative change and reduce disparities in student success among racial groups, with valuable insights for any community college reformer.

Given recent unrest due to COVID-19 and police violence, constructive dialogue is more critical than ever to support a race-conscious approach to achieving more equitable outcomes for America’s students of color, and these tools provide guidance to accomplish this critical goal.

Equity workshop in Oregon for guided pathways implementation

Debra D. Bragg. (2019, November 14). Approaching guided pathways with an equity and evaluative lens.  Workshop presented for the Oregon Student Success Center at the Oregon Guided Pathways Institute in Eugene, Oregon.

Debra Bragg presented a workshop on using an equity lens for guided pathways implementation in Oregon’s community colleges. This interactive session engages participants in examining how their colleges align their campus work on diversity, inclusion, equity and equity-mindedness with guided pathways. Participants identify action items to address systemic inequities that have been overlooked in guided pathways implementation.

View Slides

NSF ATE Project Update

Leveraging statewide longitudinal data to improve technical education pathways

Phase one, in this three-year landscape study of National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education (NSF ATE) programs funded in Washington in the last ten years, has begun. Our team, consisting of University of Washington researchers, and faculty and administrators from Seattle Central College, Green River College, and Skagit Valley College are working to understand the current use and need for student-level outcomes data in technical programs. This phase of our research will inform phase two, where we work to be the connective tissue that gets relevant data in the hands of technical program faculty. The first advisory committee meeting will be held on January 8, 2020, at the University of Washington.  The meeting will provide an overview of the project from the UW team, college co-PIs, and partners and gather input on key aspects of the research plan.

View our STEM page for ongoing information about this study as well as other STEM-focused research and/ or evaluation projects.

Read Project Brochure

Supporting and Advancing Geoscience Education in Two-Year Colleges, Faculty as Change Agents

In fall 2015, “Supporting and Advancing Geoscience Education in Two-year Colleges (SAGE 2YC) Faculty as Change Agents” was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). This ambitious project focuses on improving two-year college geoscience education at the course, program, department, institution, region, and professional levels. It works through the efforts of two-year college geoscience faculty who act as “change agents” in implementing and sustaining improvements in three areas:

1.  Broadened student access to and participation in geoscience education
2.  Increased emphasis on the academic success of students
3.  Improved career and transfer pathways for students

Since the start of the grant four years ago, SAGE 2YC has formed two cohorts of geoscience faculty at community colleges across the country, with cohort 1 involving 11 teams comprised of 23 faculty change agents and cohort 2 involving 6 teams involving 13 faculty change agents. As the project nears completion in 2020, important lessons are emerging for community colleges and STEM educators nationally, many of which are captured in a blog written on September 12, 2019 by our director, Debra Bragg. Research completed by Dr. Bragg and other members of the evaluation/research team provide valuable insights on the work of faculty change agents nationwide.

For community colleges that are engaged in guided pathways and other reforms focusing on student success, results from this research may provide lessons to help others advance organizational changes to support more equitable student success.

Leadership of the SAGE 2YC project come from two- and four-year colleges and universities across the country. Their names and contact information is available here.

Read Report

What Works for Adult Learners?

Millions of adults in the United States are trying to support themselves and their families without a high school education. Millions more have finished high school but still lack some of the basic reading, writing, and math skills needed to succeed in the current labor market. To address this, the nation needs to scale evidence-based strategies that increase adult learners’ skills which assist them in securing living-wage employment and career advancement opportunities.

Debra Bragg, director of CCRI, collaborated with Barbara Endel and other Jobs for the Future (JFF) colleagues, Nate Anderson, Lisa Soricone, and Erica Acevedo to prepare a brief on lessons learned about career pathways for adult learners. The brief summarizes the results of 16 experimental and quasi-experimental design studies conducted to date on career pathways.

Findings show that most rigorous research and evaluation focus on the early stages of adult preparation, the entry and integrated training phases of the career pathway, and far less is known about adult career progression. Policy and program solutions that prepare adults for all phases of their trajectory into and through careers are needed to support the economy. The brief concludes by calling for more strategic policy, practice and research to help advance career pathway opportunities for adult learners nationwide.

What Works for Adult Learners: Lessons from Career Pathways Evaluations, by Debra Bragg with Barbara Endel, Nate Anderson, Lisa Soricone, and Erica Acevedo, Jobs for the Future. This research is mostly funded by the U.S. Department of Labor and Department of Health and Human Services.

Read the Report

CCRI goes to Florida!

CCRI Advances Coaching for Change (C4C) Efforts

As a national partner of Jobs for the Future (JFF), CCRI supports the Student Success Center Network (SSCN) Coaching Program with strategy development. Since 2017, CCRI has collaborated with Student Success Center (SSC) executive and assistant directors from around the country to advance statewide coaching initiatives. Building on lessons learned from the Coaching Pilot, CCRI is partnering on Jobs for the JFF’s (SSCN) Guided Pathways Coaching program to support SSCs in operationalizing and developing their state designed coaching plans for guided pathways implementation at scale and other reform efforts. Five SSCs from around the country received grants to participate in this two year program. 

These five SSCs convened for a half-day workshop to learn from and about each other’s coaching program and tools we created for them to advance their coaching work. The discussion we facilitated allowed SSCs to share and learn from one another on the following topics; strategic planning, college readiness for coaching, and advancing racial equity. Throughout the discussion, we introduced drafts of our tools and resources related to each of these topics that are grounded in organizational change, coaching principles, equity-mindedness, and Center for Urban Education’s Equity by Design principles.

Read about Coaching for Change

Designing Destiny: How to Engage in Equity and Inclusion

CCRI’s Dr. Lia Wetzstein and Katie Kovacich joined Oregon’s SSC Executive Director Elizabeth Cox Brand and New York’s Rockland Community College President Dr. Michael Baston in leading a working session at Jobs for the Future’s (JFF) Postsecondary State Network Bi-Annual Meeting in Fort Lauderdale. 

In our session, Designing Destiny: How to Engage in Equity and Inclusion, we used frameworks based on Reflective and Critical Reflective Practice and the Collaboration Continuum to give attendees the tools and strategies they need to navigate and facilitate the sometimes difficult conversations that people must have in order to truly engage in the critical work of improving diversity, equity, and inclusion. We highlighted practices at both the system and institutional levels, and offered examples from the coaching model being used in the Oregon Pathways cohorts and the engagement strategy that Rockland Community College uses to build campus-based support with and through stakeholders.

HPTP Data Note 9: Transfer Partnerships and a Culture of Collaboration

In Data Note 6, we described a variety institutional transfer partnership typologies, differentiating those with increasing levels of collaboration and describing aspects of their culture, policy and practices. This Data Note draws upon qualitative findings from the High-Performing Transfer Partnerships (HPTP) study to more fully elucidate a construct described by an interviewee as a “culture of collaboration”, which we found in partnerships that demonstrated the highest level of collaboration.

 

Continue reading “HPTP Data Note 9: Transfer Partnerships and a Culture of Collaboration”