Search | Directories | Reference Tools
UW Home > UWIN > Student Learning Objectives System 
UW Student Learning Objectives System

Overview
• Design Philosophy
• UW SLOs

Technology
• SLO Encoder
• SLO Reporter
• MyLO (Student)
• SLO Admin
• Architecture

About the Project
• Contact Information
• Funding
• Researchers
• Availability

Links

 

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

Development and support of the Student Learning Objectives system is now discontinued. The system was removed from production at UW in January, 2007.

 

The Student Learning Objectives (SLO) system is a suite of four web applications under development at the University of Washington. This project has three principal purposes: (1) to improve our understanding of the learning experiences offered to students; (2) to advance the assessment of learning; and (3) to prepare for the UW decennial accreditation.

Learning objectives can be thought of as a more finely grained version of distribution requirements. There are high-level categories of objectives such as Analytic, Communication and Intellectual, and under each of those, a number of specific objectives such as Writing, Foreign Language, Quantitative Principles, Society and the Environment, and Arts Appreciation. Additionally, departments or individual faculty members can create their own custom learning objectives specific to their domains.

All courses (including independent studies) at the UW are encoded by their instructors in terms of the learning objectives that they offer. Every course has a total of 100 learning objective points. It is entirely up to the faculty member to decide how to divide up those points among the 15 University-wide standard learning objectives, and any custom learning objectives.

When compiled for a department, program, or major, for a set of students (e.g., all seniors), or for UW graduates as a whole, these data represent a powerful new implement in the toolbox of learning assessment. For example, we can easily answer questions such as "How well are juniors in the College of Engineering learning to write?" or "How well are English majors learning to conduct experiments?" These encodings comprise one of the most detailed and comprehensive views of undergraduate learning available for a research  university.

Eventually, students will have direct access to their own personal learning objective profiles, and will be able to use learning objectives as an additional basis for choosing courses. This will be a tool to enable a continuous self-reflection on where the student has been, where she is going, and what kind of person she is becoming. By creating a set of shared principles and goals for a UW education, learning objectives will give highly motivated students the freedom to create their own learning experiences outside of the classroom.

Design Philosophy

The UW SLO System's primary purpose is to better understand the characteristics of the learning experiences that UW faculty offer to undergraduate students. To that end, there are five main design goals:

  • Allow for and honor differences between academic units.
  • Allow faculty to control the encodings for their own courses, and the definitions of their own learning objectives.
  • Be consistent with national momentum to improve undergraduate education.
  • Provide meaningful feedback.
  • Be simple, efficient, and scaleable.

What we are after is a measure of what learning experiences we offer to students. This system makes no attempt to assess what students actually learn in any course. Hence the name Student Learning Objectives, not Student Learning Outcomes.

For the most part, what professors encode are courses, but in fact they can be any credit-bearing learning experience, including independent studies. Learning objectives apply to the learning experience-instructor unit rather than simply to the course. This recognizes the primacy of the instructor in shaping the course. If Professor A teaches SOC 301 one quarter, and Professor B teaches it the next quarter, both of them will code the course separately. One of the most important strengths of a university is that the professors bring their own special knowledge, passion, and focus to teaching. Student learning objective/outcome systems that insist that all courses with the same title are alike miss the great comparative advantage of university-level education.

UW Student Learning Objectives

University learning objectives represent broad conceptual categories. If professors from a wide array of fields are asked about the single most important learning outcome for their students, the most common answer is, “Learning to think (critically)”. Does this mean precisely the same thing when a physics professor says it as when an English professor says it? Probably not. Nonetheless, it speaks to a commonly held belief about the meaning of education. Like other commonly held beliefs, highly refined definitions of learning objectives are hard to come by. Professors and other instructors should feel free to interpret these categories as they will.

The UW SLO System is configured to use a set of University-level learning objectives which were drawn from the National Survey of Student Learning; these objectives have been replicated and tested nationally to describe learning objectives. Additionally, the UW has used these objectives in surveys of alumni 1, 5, and 10 years out. The very interesting findings of those surveys are available online.

In many cases, there are learning objectives specific to a course or learning experience that are not captured by the list of University learning objectives, but are central to the course, nonetheless. A prerequisite critical skill is a good example. In Geography, Geographical Information Systems (GIS) is a specific skill that is fundamental to the learning process in many courses and is taught in the course. In instances like this, professors and other instructors are free to designate additional learning objectives customized to specific courses. Once a customized learning objective has been added by any instructor in a given unit, it is automatically listed as an option for all courses within that unit. All customized learning objectives are designated as departmental learning objectives. It is not necessary to add customized objectives, unless desired.

UW Learning Objectives

This is the list of University of Washington standard learning objectives, shared by all courses in all departments:

Analytic
To advance the capacity to think, to understand basic principles, and to reason.
Problem Solving
Defining and solving problems.
Locate Information
Locating information needed to help make decisions or solve problems.
Critical Analysis
Critically analyzing written information.

Intellectual
To develop the capacity for knowledge and understanding.
Philosophies and Cultures
Understanding and appreciating diverse philosophies and cultures.
Quantitative Principles
Understanding and applying quantitative principles and methods.
Scientific Principles
Understanding and applying scientific principles and methods.
Society and Environment
Understanding the interaction of society and the environment.
Arts Appreciation
Understanding and appreciating the arts.

Communication
To advance the capacity to express oneself clearly in different contexts, and to develop the skills to have interchanges of ideas with diverse others.
Writing
Writing effectively.
Foreign Language
Using a foreign language.
Speaking
Speaking effectively.

Interpersonal
To advance the skills necessary for working with others toward a common goal.
Leadership
Developing management or leadership capabilities.
Working Cooperatively
Working Cooperatively in a group.

Other
Independence
Working/learning independently to advance the habits of lifelong learning.
Modern Technology
Working effectively with modern technology, especially computers.

Departmental Objectives

Here are a few of the learning objectives that have been developed by individual departments at the UW:

Geography
geographic information
Understanding the spatial characteristics and analytical requirements for geographically-referenced data
GIS
a combination of hardware, software, data, people, procedures, and institutional arrangements for collecting, storing, manipulating, analyzing, and displaying information about spatially distributed phenomena for the purpose of inventory, problem solving and/or decision making in operations, management, policy, and research contexts
access
The opportunity of interaction and the ability to obtain resources. Related keywords include opportunity, location, inequality,and identity.
scale
The representation of reality at one particular level. Key questions involving the concept of scale include scale standardization, scale dependence and scale linkage. Related keywords include: global-local, regionalism, urban-rural, and cartography.
movement
The flow of people and things across space and time. Geographers are particularly interested in the relationship of movement to social and spatial change. Related keywords include: migration, trade, transportation, and disease.
citizenship
Membership and participation in a community. This membership takes place on a number of different grounds, including legal, political and cultural grounds. Related keywords include: participation, community, democracy, and accountability.
globalization
The diverse processes associated with accelerating economic, cultural and political interdependencies across national borders. An increasing proportion of the world's economic activity is now transnational in scope. Related keywords include: information, transnationalism, restructuring, and neo-liberalism.
sustainability
The condition where the demands placed upon the environment by people and commerce can be met without reducing the capacity of the environment to provide for future generations. Related keywords include: development, environment, resources, and hazards.
representation
Geographers work with and through representations - abstractions that simplify elements of the world for specific purposes. Related keywords include: scale, technology, epistemology, method. The facets of representation collectively point to the complex doubleness of this concept, for each, in its turn, determines how an object, event, natural or social process, or economic activity is defined, quantified, interpreted, and portrayed. Thus each offers a fixed but distorted and incomplete lens on social practices and outcomes. The types of questions raised in our classes and research point to these ambiguities and complexities of representation.
well being
the quality of life for people in different places and cultures
environmental sensitivity
concern for the relationship between geography and environment

Laboratory Medicine
Professionalism
Understanding and applying responsibility and ethics related to patient care and laboratory services
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
Understanding and applying the principles of quality control/quality assurance.
Safety
Understanding and applying the principles of safety in the clinical laboratory.
Technical
Developing the skills necessary for working in a clinical laboratory.
Aerospace Studies (Air Force ROTC)
Core Values/Ethical Behavior
Students must demonstrate an understanding of and abide by the USAF core values of integrity first, service before self, and excellence in all we do.
Customs and Courtesies
AFROTC students must learn and practice proper military customs and courtesies in the classroom, during leadership laboratory, and when interfacing with other cadets, instructors, and staff.
Listening
To be good officers and leaders, students need to be good listeners. This most neglected communication skill is extremely important for officers who counsel, discipline, and mentor.
Professionalism/Officership
Students should have an understanding of what it means to be a professional, and the role of the professional military officer in society. They need to reflect a professional, responsible behavior as part of their studies.