SUBJECT: Costing Policy for Sponsored Agreements

The University's Costing Policy for Sponsored Agreements is attached. The policy was finalized by the University Controller as a result of the required implementation of applicable federal Cost Accounting Standards, and after extensive campus communication, discussion, and input from faculty, administrators, the Research Advisory Board, and the Faculty Council on Research.

The policy is effective July 1, 1997 and will apply to all costs incurred on sponsored agreements as of January 1, 1998.

Questions regarding the policy may be directed to Grant and Contract Accounting at 543-8454.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. Definitions

1. Definition of Direct Costs
2. Definition of Indirect Costs

III. Consistent Treatment of Direct and Indirect Costs

IV. Distribution of Direct Costs Between Two or More Grants or Contracts

1. Proportional Benefit Rule
2. Interrelationship Rule

V. Direct Costs

VI. Indirect Costs

1. Administrative and Clerical Salaries
   1. Exceptional Circumstances
   2. Implementation Procedures
2. Other Indirect Costs
   1. Justifying the Treatment of Normal Indirect Costs as Direct Costs
   2. Examples of Unique Circumstances Justifying Direct Charges
3. Rebudgeting of Usual Indirect Costs

Appendix B: Office Supplies

I. Introduction

This policy takes into account the unique needs and requirements of the Universitys research community and still complies with the requirements of OMB Circular A-21. Future modifications to this and other internal policies may be necessary as further adjustments and interpretations are issued by the federal government.

The University delegates considerable authority and responsibility for fiscal compliance to Principal Investigators (PIs) and their departments. This requires the development of significant expertise at the department level and relies heavily on PIs and departmental fiscal staff to comply with UW policies and various sponsor rules and regulations.

II. Definitions

Direct Costs

OMB Circular A-21, Section D.1, states:

Direct costs are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity, or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or F&A costs. Where an institution treats a particular type of cost as a direct cost of sponsored agreements, all costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances shall be treated as direct costs of all activities of the institution.

A cost is considered direct when a specific grant or contract gains explicit benefit from the cost for a specific programmatic purpose. For example, a PIs salary, when represented by scientific effort on a particular grant or contract, is an example of an allowable direct cost to that grant or contract.

Indirect Costs

OMB Circular A-21, Section E.1, states:

F&A costs are those that are incurred for common or joint objectives and therefore cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity.

At educational institutions such costs normally are classified under the following indirect categories: depreciation and use allowances, general administration and general expenses, sponsored projects administration expenses, operation and maintenance expenses, library expenses, departmental administration expenses, and student administration and services.

Indirect costs are infrastructure costs of the University that support the programs of the institution, including research and other sponsored programs. Examples of indirect costs are building depreciation, maintenance costs, the cost of electricity and heat, accounting services, personnel services, departmental administration, purchasing and human subjects administration.

Refer to GIM 22, Indirect Costs: An Explanation, for additional information regarding indirect costs.

1. A-21 refers to indirect costs as Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs. This policy will use the term Indirect Costs.

III. Consistent Treatment of Direct and Indirect Costs

Consistency in the context of CAS 502 means that costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, must be treated uniformly either as direct costs or as indirect costs. Since certain costs such as salaries of administrative and clerical staff and office supplies are normally treated as indirect costs, these costs cannot be charged directly to federal grants or contracts unless the circumstances related to a particular project are clearly different from the normal operations of the institution.

For example, although office supplies are normally treated as an indirect cost, a particular grant or contract may have a special need for envelopes to mail hundreds of survey questionnaires. In this case, it is appropriate to charge the grant or contract directly for the envelopes required to conduct the survey because those needed would significantly exceed the quantity routinely provided by the office. The mailing of the questionnaires creates an "unlike circumstance" for envelopes and other as supplies used for the survey, but not for other routine office supplies unrelated to the survey.

IV. Distribution of Direct Costs Between Two or More Grants or Contracts

OMB Circular A-21 provides two methods for allocating an allowable direct cost to two or more grants.

OMB Circular A-21, Section C.4.d.(3), states:

If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost should be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit.

If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then...the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefited projects on any reasonable basis...

1. The Proportional Benefit Rule

   The proportional benefit rule applies when it is possible to determine the proportional benefit of the cost to each project. The cost is allocated according to the proportion of benefit provided to each project. For example, the cost of lab supplies might be allocated based upon the quantity used (or planned to be used) on each project.

2. The Interrelationship Rule

   The interrelationship rule applies when it is not possible to determine the proportional benefit to each project because of the interrelationship of the work involved. The cost is distributed on any reasonable basis because the proportional benefit cannot be quantified and identified to the individual projects. For example, the cost of lab supplies might be allocated based upon the allocation of employee salaries to each project.

V. Direct Costs

A. Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits

• Faculty
• Research Associates
• Predoctoral and Postdoctoral Fellows
• Technicians, Lab Assistants, Graduate Students
• Tuition remission for Graduate Students

B. Supplies and Materials

• Chemicals
• Laboratory Supplies
• Computer Software
• Drugs
• Books
• Minor Equipment
• Uniforms
• Photographic supplies
• Tools
• Animals

C. Other Direct Costs

• Travel
• Postage
• Subcontracts
• Radioactive Waste Disposal
• Consulting Services
• Equipment
• Animal Care
• Motor Pool
• Other costs specifically identified and justified in funded proposals (see section VI)
• Long distance telephone costs
• Freight and Express
• Patient Care and Subject costs
• Costs that are normally indirect may be charged to non-federally sponsored agreements if permitted by the sponsors policies/practices or are otherwise approved by the sponsor
• Off-Campus Projects Only
  
  Office Supplies
  Basic Telephone Services - such as phone installation, monthly line charges, basic instruments
  Facilities Costs - such as rent, maintenance, security, utilities

VI. Indirect Costs

As noted in II.B., indirect costs include institutional infrastructure costs for research and other sponsored programs. The focus of this section of the policy will be on those indirect costs generally incurred by academic departments. Costs incurred for program support and administration which occur at the college, school and department levels which should normally be treated as indirect are identified in section A (Administrative and Clerical Salaries) and section B (Other Indirect Costs).

A. Administrative and Clerical Salaries

The salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as F&A costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly budgets for administrative or clerical services and individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity.

Administrative and clerical salaries may be treated as direct costs under certain exceptional and unlike circumstances as described below.

1. Exceptional and Unlike Circumstances

   On July 13, 1994, OMB issued an interpretation of Circular A-21, Section F.6.b, that states:

   ...direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where the nature of the work performed under a particular project requires an extensive amount of administrative or clerical support which is significantly greater than the routine level of such services provided by academic departments. The costs would need to meet the general criteria for direct charging in section D.1. -- i.e., be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy, and the special circumstances requiring direct charging of the services would need to be justified to the satisfaction of the awarding agency in the grant application or contract proposal.

   The following are examples provided by OMB to illustrate circumstances where direct charging of administrative and clerical salaries may be appropriate.

   • Large, complex programs, such as General Clinical Research Centers, Primate Centers, Program Projects, environmental research centers, engineering research centers, and other grants and contracts that entail assembling and managing teams of investigators from a number of institutions.
     
     
   • Projects which involve extensive data accumulation, analysis and entry, surveying, tabulation, cataloging, searching literature, and reporting, such as epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and retrospective clinical records studies.
     
     
   • Projects that require making travel and meeting arrangements for large numbers of participants, such as conferences and seminars.
     
     
   • Projects whose principal focus is the preparation and production of manuals and large reports, books and monographs (excluding routine progress and technical reports).
     
     
   • Projects that are geographically inaccessible to normal departmental administrative services, such as seagoing research vessels, radio astronomy projects, and other research field sites that are remote from the campus.
     
     
   • Individual projects requiring project-specific database management; individualized graphics or manuscript preparation; human or animal protocols, IRB preparations and/or other project-specific regulatory protocols; and multiple project-related investigator coordination and communications.

   OMB also states as part of this interpretation:

   These examples are not exhaustive nor are they intended to imply that direct charging of administrative or clerical salaries would always be appropriate for the situations illustrated in the examples.

   Where direct charges for administrative and clerical salaries are made, care must be exercised to assure that costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances are consistently treated as direct costs for all activities.

2. Implementation Procedures

   See Attachment A for a list of Job Class codes that are considered Administrative and Clerical.

   Responsibilities that fall within normal departmental administrative functions cannot be charged directly to sponsored projects. The costs of administrative work such as routine budget monitoring, filing and other general office tasks are not usually considered allowable direct costs because such work is common across many sponsored projects. Such costs may support grant or contract activities, but they are classified as indirect costs because they do not meet the major activity and specific identification standards of OMB Circular A-21, section F.6.b.

   Administrative or clerical salaries may be directly charged only if they meet the following requirements:

   1. They fall within the special circumstances described in the OMB interpretation quoted in section VI.A.1 of this policy.
      
      
   2. The individual has responsibilities specifically identifiable to the work of the project and the effort devoted to the project is documented.
      
      
   3. The title, percent of effort and salary of the administrative or clerical position is included in the proposed budget of the sponsored agreement, and the special circumstances requiring direct charging of the services are justified in the proposal.
      
      
   4. The sponsoring agency accepts the cost as part of the projects direct cost budget. That is, the sponsor does not specifically disapprove the cost in the award or in other notice it gives to the University.

B. Other Indirect Costs

• Office Supplies (see Appendix B)*
• Toner Cartridges and Diskettes*
• Basic Local Telephone Services On Campus - Basic services include phone installation, monthly line charges, basic instruments*
• Cellular Phones, pagers and Related Service Charges*
• Routine Copying Charges*
• Memberships
• Journals and Subscriptions

* Under this policy, these costs will be allowable as direct costs for off-campus, APL and Regional Primate Center awards. These costs will not require prior approval from the funding agency or other internal written documentation to incur as direct costs.

1. Justifying the Treatment of Normal Indirect Costs as Direct Costs

   These types of costs may be directly charged only if they meet the following requirements:

   1. The project has a special need for the item or service involved that is beyond the level of services normally provided.
      
      
   2. The costs can be specifically identified to the work conducted under the project.
      
      
   3. The costs are specified in the proposed budget of the sponsored agreement, and the special circumstances requiring direct charging are justified in the proposal.
      
      
   4. The sponsoring agency accepts the cost as part of the projects direct cost budget. That is, the sponsor does not specifically disapprove the cost in the award or in other notice it gives to the University.
      
      
2. Examples of Unique Circumstances Justifying Direct Charges
   
   
   • Office Supplies - Envelopes used to mail an unusually large number of research questionnaires.
   • Toner Cartridges, Diskettes, Tapes for Tape Drive Backup - The grant or contract research involves extensive data accumulation and analysis.
   • Basic Local Telephone Service On Campus - A hotline or crisis line that is specifically required by a grant or contract.
   • Memberships - A membership in a professional or scientific organization if joining is the only means of obtaining a specific journal or periodical directly related to a grant or contract.
   • Journals and Subscriptions - The cost of a journal or subscription may be directly charged if the content is specifically and solely related to the grant or contract.

C. Rebudgeting of Usual Indirect Costs

When a need arises and where sponsoring agencies permit rebudgeting after a project has started, to incur costs that are normally indirect, the need and the exceptional circumstances must be justified and documented in writing by the PI and maintained in the departmental grant file.

Office of Sponsored Programs
4333 Brooklyn Ave NE | Box 359472
Seattle, WA 98195-9472 | (206) 543-4043 | Fax 685-1732 | Contact Us
Modified: January 6, 2011