Cost Accounting Standards
Included on this page:
Definition/Background:
In 1994, the Cost Accounting Standard Board (CASB) established CAS.
CAS was
extended to grants and cooperative agreements in Circular A-21 in 1996.
- Four standards and disclosure statements are the components of CAS.
- The standards apply to all grants, contracts and cooperative
agreements (collectively called sponsored agreements).
- The disclosure statement requirement applies to all institutions
receiving $25 M (regardless of amounts of individual
awards
- The University of Washington (UW) and other universities receiving federal
funds are required to comply with the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) set
forth in Appendix A,
OMB
Circular A-21 (Cost Principles for Educational Institutions).
- In accordance with these standards, the UW submitted a Disclosure Statement
that describes cost accounting practices and methodologies in effect at the UW.
It was approved in November 1999 by DHHS, the UW’s cognizant agency.
CAS Standards:
CAS 501: Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating and Reporting Costs
by Educational Institutions
- An educational institution's practices used in estimating costs shall
be consistent with the educational institution's cost accounting
practices used to accumulate and report costs. Applies to costs
charged as well as cost sharing (costs that are contributed).
- GIM-1 provides guidance
CAS 502: Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose
by Educational Institutions
CAS 505: Accounting for Unallowable Costs
- Unallowable costs shall be identified and excluded from any billing,
claim, application, or proposal applicable to a Sponsored Agreement.
CAS 506: Consistency in Using the Same Accounting Period for Purposes
of Estimating, Accumulating and Reporting Costs.
- Educational institutions shall use their fiscal year as their cost
accounting period
Disclosure Statement is a comprehensive description of an
organization’s cost accounting practices and includes direct costs, indirect
costs (Facilities & Administration), depreciation and use allowance, leave
costs and applicable credits, deferred compensation/insurance costs and
central systems and group expenses.
Direct Costs are costs incurred to support a project and are
charged to sponsored projects when the costs can be specifically identified to
the project with relative ease and with a high degree of accuracy and are allowed by all terms and conditions governing a particular award.
Facilities &
Administrative Costs (indirect costs) are general institutional
expenditures that are incurred for common or joint objectives benefiting
instruction, research, or public service and therefore cannot be readily
identified with a particular sponsored project.
By definition,
Unlike Circumstances exist when costs are:
- above the normal level of services or items required for a project.
- for technical expertise or items not otherwise needed by department are
required.
Applies to:
CAS Covered Sponsored Projects:
(budget type 05)
- All federal awards
- All awards that contain any federal flow-through money
- All awards where the terms and conditions of the proposal or award
documents reference OMB Circular A-21 or Cost Accounting Standards
- Any sponsored project whose funds are being used as cost sharing on a CAS
covered project. Only the individual cost(s) being used as cost sharing will be
subject to the definitions of direct charges and "unlike circumstances
- Awards not covered under CAS are still subject to the requirements listed
in the award and University and State guidelines.
Process:
Agency Approval:
Sponsor approval of a budget does not in and of itself constitute approval
of the specific line items. The sponsor assumes you have complied with A-21,
the University’s Disclosure Statement, the University’s F&A cost proposal,
and any other regulations cited.
Unallowable Costs:
Costs considered "unallowable" must be identified and may not be budgeted,
charged or reported to a sponsor. (See OMB A-21, Part J)
UW Costing Policy:
- Direct costs are directly charged when specifically identified.
- Direct costs that require additional documentation/justification and
sponsor approval:
A budget justification must be prepared if any of the following costs are
budgeted within the cost categories:
- Administrative and Clerical Salaries (see details below)
- Office Supplies (details below)
- Routine Copying (details below)
- Basic Telephone (details below)
- Memberships, Journals and Subscriptions (details below)
If the need to incur expenses in the following categories occurs during
the project (i.e. they were not included in the proposed budget) a budget
justification must be prepared and sponsor approval must be received before the
expenses can be rebudgeted or charged as a direct cost. The justification
must include detail that clearly demonstrates the cost meets the definition of
an unlike circumstance. Awards received from the
National Institute of Health, the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research do not need
sponsor approval.
- Administrative and Clerical Salaries:
Direct charging of such costs may be considered where a major project or
activity explicitly allows for administrative or clerical salaries and the
individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or
activity. The nature of the work performed under a project should require an
extensive amount of administrative or clerical support that is significantly
greater than the routine level of services provided by the department. The
following are specific examples of when direct charging of administrative and
clerical salaries might be allowable:
- large complex programs such as centers or other projects
that entail assembling and managing teams of PI's from a number of
institutions.
- specific research activities involving extensive data
collection, statistical analysis and entry, database management, surveying,
tabulation, cataloging and researching literature.
- projects that require making travel and meeting
arrangements for large numbers of participants, such as conferences and
seminars.
- projects whose principal focus is the preparation and
production of manuals and large reports or books. (This does not include
routine progress and technical reports).
- projects that are geographically inaccessible to normal
departmental administrative services such as seagoing research vessels and other research
field sites that are remote from the campus.
- Office Supplies:
Supplies can be directly charged when:
the purchase of the supplies is extensive in nature,
they can be specifically identified to the project and meet the
definition of a direct cost.
- Basic Telephone:
Long distance telephone expenses for telephone calls, fax transmittals and
various other communication expenses specific to a project and incurred for
the sole direct benefit of the project may be allowed as a direct charge.
Installation charges, monthly use charges, local access calls, pagers, etc. are
considered F&A costs and should not be charged directly to sponsored
accounts.
- Memberships, Journals and Subscriptions:
An individual membership or subscription to a professional group or
periodical must be indirectly charged unless specifically and solely related to
the sponsored award.
- Distribution of direct costs:
- Proportional Benefit Rule: cost is allocated
according to the proportion of benefit provided to each project, i.e. lab
supplies allocated between two grants based on quantity used.
- Interrelationship Rule: cost is distributed
based on any ‘reasonable’ basis when it is not possible to determine the proportional
benefit rate, i.e.lab supplies allocated based on allocation of employees
salaries to each grant.
- Consistency:
- Same costs cannot be charged as both direct and indirect
costs.
- Costs must be treated uniformly (as either a direct or
an indirect cost)
unless there are unlike circumstances.
Non-CAS Covered Projects:
Cost accounting policies for sponsored awards not subjected to CAS will be
dependent upon the individual terms and conditions of the award. Expenditures
that are not allowed as direct charges on sponsored awards subject to CAS may
be considered allowable as direct charges on those awards not subject to CAS.
All charges to any contract or grant should be necessary, reasonable,
allocable and allowable under the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Cost share policy
- Propose cost sharing only when required by agency
guidelines, delineated
in specific program announcements or when considered as part of the proposal
evaluation process.
- Mandatory by statute or program requirement as a condition
of the award.
- Voluntary when proposed but not required.
- Costs used to meet cost sharing requirement must meet criteria
of an allowable direct cost of that particular project.
Department’s responsibilities:
- Documentation placed in award proposal when directly
charging costs that
are normally indirect.
- Indirect costs charged directly only when unlike
circumstances exist and
are justified in award proposal or file.
- Rebudgeting (if allowable) to be justified, documented and
filed in
departmental file
- Develop and follow Delegation of Signature Authority
policy. Ensure
authorized signatures are on all required documents according to
GIM 14
- Document mandatory and voluntary cost sharing
GCA responsibilities:
- Selective review for compliance with costing policies.
Helpful hints:
Ask five questions to determine allowability to directly charge
normally indirect costs:
- Unlike circumstances?
- Unlike circumstances documented in proposal?
- Expense on indirect cost list?
- May UW rebudget?
- Unlike circumstances documented and in file?
Refer to GIM 23 for a list of costs that may be charged directly to a
project or must be charged indirectly
GIM 23
Refer to CAS compliance chart for allowability and inconsistent costing
examples.
Refer to Charges to Federally Sponsored Agreement Flowchart.
References: