Earthquake Readyness Advisory Committee

Summary of Recommendations

Earthquake Readiness Advisory Committee – 1991 View full report

The following summarizes the Committee’s recommendations. There are 292 facilities within the responsibility of the University of Washington. Of these, 166 facilities of enduring interest to the University were analyzed with respect to their likelihood of sustaining significant damage in an earthquake and potential for loss of life.

A. THE FOLLOWING BUILDINGS WERE CONSIDERED TO BE LIABLE TO MAJOR SEISMIC DAMAGE AND TO HAVE A HIGH LIFE SAFETY HAZARD POTENTIAL:

Architecture Hall (1909) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Art Building (1949)
Denny Hall (1895) IN DESIGN
Edmundson Pavilion (1928) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Gowen Hall (1932)
Guggenheim Hall (1929) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Hansee Hall (1936) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Johnson Hall (1930) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Miller Hall (1922) IN PRE-DESIGN, SCHEDULED FOR RENOVATION 2011-13
Music (1950)
Parrington Hall (1902) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Savery Hall (1917) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Smith Hall (1929)
Suzzallo Library (1926) RETROFIT COMPLETED

The number in parenthesis refers to the year of construction. These buildings are likely to suffer major structural damages, possible collapse, and major non-structural damage in the event of a major earthquake. The evaluations of the 155 facilities were intended to identify the possibility of structures being susceptible to seismic damage. This overall view of the campus buildings is not the same as a detailed engineering study of individual facilities. It is recommended that the buildings listed above be studied in detail with the preparation of consequent seismic upgrade designs and then the completion of necessary fieldwork. The studies should be based on common criteria and it is recommended that “A Handbook for Seismic Evaluation,” ATC-22, be used as the basis for such engineering reviews.

B. THE FOLLOWING BUILDINGS WERE CONSIDERED TO HAVE HIGH DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND MODERATE LIFE SAFETY HAZARD:

Administration (Gerberding) Building (1949) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Anderson Hall (1925) IN PRE-DESIGN SCHEDULED FOR RENOVATION 2011-13
Chemistry Library Building (1957)
Clark Hall (1898) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Conibear Shellhouse (1949) RETROFIT COMPLETED
Hutchinson Hall (1927) SCHEDULED FOR RENOVATION 2013-15
Lewis Hall (1896) IN DESIGN
Marine Sciences Building (1966)
Pavilion Pool - Men’s (1939)
Roberts Hall (1921)
Raitt Hall (1916)
Student Union Building (1949) UNDER CONSTRUCTION

These are of the second priority and the recommendations are that the previously described procedures be applied after the completion of the work on the first list.

C. THE THIRD PRIORITY LIST OF BUILDINGS WITH HIGH DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND LOW LIFE SAFETY HAZARD INCLUDES:

Canoe House (1918)
Faculty Center (1960)
Intramural Activities Building (1968) RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
Observatory (1895)
Plant Operations Building (1929)

These buildings should be dealt with in the same manner as those listed previously after the completion of the work on the second priority.

D. A FOURTH AND FINAL GROUP OF BUILDINGS WAS INDENTIFIED. THESE BUILDINGS HAD HIGH LIFE SAFETY HAZARD BUT WITH ONLY MODERATE DAMAGE POTENTIAL:

Bagley Hall (1937)
Condon Hall (1974)
Magnuson Health Sciences Center:
Wing D
Wing I
Wing AA
Wings E and F
Wings G and H RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
D Wing Addition
MRCD Tower
Physics Hall (1928) RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
University Medical Center:
Wing EA RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
Wing EB RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
Wing SS
Wing SE RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED
Wing NN-2
Wings EE
Wing CC
Wing SW of EA RENOVATION/RETROFIT COMPLETED

The structural damage to these buildings could be minor in an earthquake and should be readily repairable. The non-structural damage could be significant and require major repairs. However, the risk to life and limb is high in these buildings, and, in the case of the medical facilities, there is a concern for their post-seismic functioning which goes beyond the immediate campus to the community at large. It is recommended that engineering studies take particular note of these life and functioning concerns.

E. SPECIAL NON TYPICAL STRUCTURES ON CAMPUS

The recommendations are particular to the nontypical structures listed in Chapter 6. The structures involved are:

Footbridges:

  • Over 15th Ave. N.E., Henry Art Gallery to Schmitz Hall RETROFIT COMPLETED
  • Two over Montlake Blvd RETROFIT COMPLETED
  • Bridge and ramp over N.E. Pacific to Hitchcock RETROFIT COMPLETED
  • Over N.E. Pacific to Health Sciences, T-Wing RETROFIT COMPLETED
  • Over Burke Gilman Trail to Health Sciences, T-Wing
  • To Edmundson Pavilion RETROFIT COMPLETED

West campus Receiving Electrical Station
Exhaust Stacks - Central Plaza RETROFIT COMPLETED
Stadium - South Structure

All these structures are recommended for engineering study and subsequent action. In the case of footbridges, these studies should follow “Seismic Design Guidelines for Highway Bridges” of the Applied Technology Council. The footbridge to Edmundson Pavilion is owned by the City of Seattle.

F. BUILDINGS WHERE POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS NON-STRUCTURAL DETAILS EXIST (TABLE 6F).

It is recommended that these components should be studied and subsequent action taken. This work has a high priority.

In the concern for the operations on the campus after an earthquake, it was noted by the Committee that the control and communication center will be located in Bryants. This building is not of enduring interest to the University and was not studied. However, until the control center is re-located, this building has a critical role in the operation of the campus. The Committee recommends that these control and communication activities be established in secure campus buildings.

The recommendations were established after a broad study of the campus facilities. None of the buildings were studied in detail. The various constituencies on the campus will read this report with their own concerns in mind. This is appropriate but it should again be emphasized that the work of the Committee involved the total rather than the parochial worries about the campus.