Search | Directories | Reference Tools
UW Home > UWIN > DO-IT 

Indicators of Institutional Change Positively Correlated With DO-IT Interventions


University of Washington (UW)

Data routinely collected at the UW that suggest impacts for DO-IT interventions to create a more welcoming and accessible environment for students with disabilities in general and specifically for the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Increased Degree Attainment of Students with Disabilities

It is impossible to determine the effect of DO-IT activities on the number of students with disabilities enrolled at the UW and their choice of majors. Specifically, there is no comparison group; UW data collected is only about a small subset of students with disabilities, namely those who request accommodations through Disability Resources for Students, which is estimated to be no more than 1/3 of the total number of students with disabilities at the UW; and a cause-effect relationship cannot be established simply from correlations.

Given these limitations, it is still of some interest to compare available data about degrees and majors of UW students with documented disabilities and students who have not disclosed disabilities. It is important to keep in mind that MOST interventions undertaken by DO-IT since 1992 do not focus on the UW; instead, they outreach to students and institutions state-wide, regionally, nationally, and internationally. Some interventions encourage the participation of students with disabilities in STEM degrees (e.g., those funded by the National Science Foundation such as AccessSTEM, but others are more generally focused on increasing the success of students with disabilities in college and careers; further, some STEM-related interventions reach out to students already interested in STEM fields, but most do not. It should also be noted that DO-IT interventions promote self-determination skills for students with disabilities and the application of universal design for instruction and student services; together, these efforts can lead to fewer students reporting disabilities to DRS, as students make use of technology (e.g., Braille translation and speech output systems for students who are blind) and other interventions to gain access to curriculum and as faculty and staff make their resources (e.g., websites) more accessible to students who have disabilities.

The table below should be interpreted with these significant limitations in mind. It reports degree and major information, comparing STEM with other fields, for UW students who disclose and for students who do not disclose disabilities.

UW Students: With Disclosed Disabilities Without Disclosed Disabilities
Degrees Majors Degrees Majors
Year Field Bachelors Graduate Undergrad Graduate Bachelors Graduate Undergrad Graduate
1991 STEM 22 2 105 14 2,736 916 9,129 3,774
non-STEM 20 7 256 38 2,790 1,666 19,411 5,104
2002 STEM 52 5 129 26 3,648 1,190 11,320 4,361
non-STEM 56 19 235 67 4,132 2,324 22,153 6,957
2007 STEM 59 11 245 49 3,908 1,258 13,143 4,667
non-STEM 71 31 395 122 4,691 2,763 21,539 7,907

1991 (Pre-DO-IT) to 2007, Degrees: There was a 210% (168% STEM) increase in undergraduate and 282% (45% STEM) increase in graduate degrees earned by students who reported disabilities (estimated to be 1/3 of actual number of students with disabilities); there was only a 56% (43% STEM) increase in undergraduate and 56% (37% STEM) increase in graduate degrees for others. Majors: STEM majors increased 133% for undergraduate and 250% for graduate students with disabilities, but only 44% and 24%, respectively, for others.

2002 (Pre-AccessSTEM) to 2007, Degrees: There was a 20% (14% STEM) increase in undergraduate and 75% (120% STEM) increase in graduate degrees for students with disabilities; there was only a 10% (7% STEM) increase in undergraduate and 14% (6% STEM) increase in graduate degrees for others. Majors: STEM majors increased 89% for undergraduate and 82% for graduate students with disabilities, but only 16% and 7%, respectively, for others.

Institutional Changes at the UW

Institutional Change: AccessSTEM and other DO-IT efforts have contributed to systematic changes at the UW: diversity issues are more broadly defined to include disability in the College of Engineering and the Office of Minority Affairs and Diversity (which instituted an Advisory Committee on Disability Issues); a user group and website were developed to guide UW webmasters on accessible web design; the Adaptive Technology Lab grew into the Access Technology Lab1 to increase consulting on accessible design; videos of campus leaders on the UW website include captions; technology units routinely develop web-based tools with accessibility features; sign language is accepted for language credit; a disability studies program was established; and the distance learning program adopted universal design policies. AccessSTEM also documented changes in STEM teaching practices of 33 precollege teachers to be more inclusive; institutionalization of AccessSTEM interventions by project collaborators; and success in getting the Northwest Engineering Talent Expansion Partnership (NW-ETEP) and other programs to recruit participants with disabilities and collect disability demographic data.

Institutional Changes at Other Institutions

Listed below are specific changes that are associated with interventions employed within specific DO-IT projects and programs.