|
|
|
|
|
The following article appeared in the Minority College Issue of Diversity/Careers in Engineering and Information Technology, Winter 1994/1995. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Industry, educational institutions, scientific and technical organizations all agree that people with disabilities don't enjoy equal access to science, mathematics and engineering (SME) academic programs and careers. Engineering education is plagued by problems of both recruitment and retention.
Those problems take many forms. Counselors, social service workers, special education teachers, and family discourage precollege students with disabilities from entering SME fields because the work is seen as too difficult. Interested students lack role models - engineers with disabilities who are successful in technical fields. When it comes to post secondary education, many schools' lab facilities and computers are inaccessible. And students continue to face negative attitudes about admission into SME courses.
"We tend to think that American males and, increasingly, females can do whatever they want, but as soon as someone has a disability we ten do think of what they can't do," says Virginia Stern, director of the Project on Science, Technology and Disability of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, Washington, DC). "No one precisely says 'no, you can't be an engineer,' but it comes through in subtler ways."
Negative faculty attitudes are a big obstacle to overcome. Dave O'Neill, a visually impaired electrical and computer engineering student at Northeastern University (Boston, MA) and president of its Disabled Students Organization, says, "If there were a secret way around [attitudinal problems], life would be easier for students with disabilities."
Elain Seymour of the Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado (Boulder, CO), reports that many instructors lack knowledge about the needs of students with disabilities. Often students with disabilities can't work at the same pace or in the same context as other students. Their computer access, particularly important for engineering students, will be limited if they don't have the assistive devices they need to compete on a level playing field.
Kevin Berg agrees. A computer science student at Seattle Pacific University (Seattle, WA), Berg has had cerebral palsy since birth. "Adaptive technology is important to disabled people because it's the only way most of them can use computers," he says.
Seymour found that some engineering departments are reluctant to accept students with disabilities into their programs, and slow to provide adequate accommodations. Again, students with hidden disabilities face more difficulties. Seymour concludes that universities need to make sure that engineering faculty understand and implement the overall school policy of accommodating students.
Jan Anderson, associate director of Northeastern University's Disability Resource Center, sees big changes there in faculty attitude. Anderson, herself a wheelchair user, remembers that in its early days the center had to coax faculty to provide accommodations to the students. Today, she says, faculty member act on their own to develop solutions for student situations.
Northeastern student Dave O'Neill is well pleased with the school's accommodations and support. He notes campus improvements such as the building of ramps, hiring of staff interpreters, provision of note-takers, availability of closed-circuit TV and magnifiers that enlarge print, and reconstruction of elevators to accommodate wheelchair users.
Sue Kroeger, director of disability services at the University of Minnesota, says her office has grown significantly in the last ten years. The school wants to move beyond solving individual problems for students to creating a barrier-free environment for all students.
AAAS is also in the process of publishing "Road Maps of Diversity." Profiling thirty-six engineers with various disabilities, the book is designed to help change the attitudes of secondary school teachers and counselors.
Headed by Jim Jones, professor of mechanical engineering, the project began as a case study of a graduate student who has been using a real-time speech-to-text translation technology. An in-class stenographer transcribes lectures using an electronic stenowriter, and transmits them to the student's personal computer. Experiments in distant connection, where the stenographer doesn't have to be in the classroom, and other variations on the system, are in the beginning stages.
Self-advocacy is a particularly important issue to Dr. Sheryl Burgstahler, assistant director/information systems for UW's College of Engineering/Computing & Communications, and director of the DO-IT program. She points out that people with disabilities are put in a dependent role and get used to it. But if they are going to be successful, it is vital for students with disabilities to be self-advocates - very clear and specific about what they need from faculty and how their disabilities may impact their scholastic performance.
Overall, many institutions are working toward the goal of increased participation of students with disabilities in SME programs. To accomplish that goal, students will need access to adaptive technologies, open-minded teachers, and positive role models. If those students are to make it to graduation, efficient, reliable, and consistent support services will be a must.
Business/technology writer Gina Roos is based in Plymouth, MA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|