University of Washington DO-IT Home   Site Map     Search     Glossary
[DOIT Logo]
Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology

The Faculty Room

Accommodations and
Universal Design
Rights and Responsibilities Faculty Resources Faculty Presentations Resources for Trainers, Staff, and Administrators
Disability Type | Academic Activity | Universal Design
Large Lectures | Group Work | Test Taking | Field Work | Science Labs | Computer Labs | Computers - Adaptive Technology | Web Pages | Distance Learning | Design and Art | Writing Assignments | International/Travel Programs | Work-Based Learning
Young scholar peering into science jar
DID
YOU
KNOW?

Test anxiety is common among students with learning disabilities.

Search Knowledge Base
Knowledge Base
Articles by Topic
Enter Other Access
College Rooms
About
The Faculty Room
project
Evaluate this site.

Test Taking Case Study 1

Case Study 1 | Case Study 2 | FAQ | Resources

Shirley and Test Taking: A Case Study on Accommodations for Blindness

Background
My name is Shirley. I am a graduate student in psychology and I'm blind.

Access Issue
In one of my courses, I wanted to take my exams using a computer and adaptive technology rather than using a reader and a scribe. I explained to my professor that while using a reader and a scribe provides access to my exams, this accommodation can be cumbersome and time consuming, especially for essay exams. This accommodation also does not allow me to take an exam without the assistance of a sighted person. With a computer, screen reading software, a speech synthesizer, and an exam in electronic format, I can take a test independently. My professor was reluctant to allow this accommodation because he was concerned about test security.

Solution
I worked with my professor, the campus student disability resource center and the testing center. We decided I would take my exams in the computer access lab in the university's disability resource center. The professor delivered the exam to the testing center at least two days before the exam. Then, the adaptive technology specialist prepared the electronic version of the exam using a scanner and optical character recognition software. She also proofread the exam, saved it on a disk and kept the disk in a locked file in her office for test security. During each exam I was monitored by the adaptive technology specialist or a student assistant.

Conclusion
This case demonstrates:

  1. How accessible computer technology can increase the independence of students with disabilities during exams.

  2. How computer technology and test proctors can be used during exams without compromising security.

  3. How coordinated efforts between faculty, students, and disability support services can lead to accommodations that are acceptable to all parties.