University of Washington
Administrative Policy Statements
March 1, 2004 2.1.4

Table of Contents
      

UW Information Systems Security

(Approved by the President by authority of Executive Order No. 2)


4.   Authorities

The UW is required to comply with many state and federal laws, regulations, and promulgated rules. Beyond strict compliance requirements, the UW needs to understand and consider several additional government and industry standards and best practices that contribute to ensuring the security and availability of information technology systems and networks and the confidentiality and integrity of electronic information.

This section lists the statutes, regulations, codes, and other practices that directly or indirectly affect this policy and operational guidelines reflected in this document. They are grouped under four headings, corresponding to the authorities or other bodies that make, enforce, and share them: state and federal statutes and regulations, other primary national and international authorities, national and international common criteria, and additional national and UW information sources for policy.

a.   State and Federal Statutes and Regulations

Below are listed state and federal statutes and regulations that directly or indirectly affect this policy and operational guidelines and that are reflected in this document. While every owner and user of UW information systems is not expected to have read all of these documents, they are listed here for reference and to demonstrate the volume and complexity of rules that relate to the use of computers, networks, applications, and data at the UW.

1)

 

Revised Code of Washington (RCW)

Applicable Revised Codes of Washington include the following:

  • RCW 5.60.060, Who Are Disqualified — Privileged Communications (communications made to a public officer in official confidence, when the public interest would suffer by disclosure).

  • Chapter 9.73 RCW — Violating Right of Privacy (Privacy Act).

  • RCW 9A.48.100 — Malicious Mischief — "Physical Damage" Defined.

  • RCW 9A.52.110, 9A.52.120, and 9A.52.130 — Computer trespass.

  • RCW 19.190.020 — Unpermitted or Misleading Electronic Mail — Prohibition (Unsolicited Electronic Mail Act).

  • Chapter 40.14 RCW — Preservation and Destruction of Public Records (records management, retention, and destruction).

  • RCW 42.17.020 — Definitions (public records "writing" inclusive of graphics and computer records).

  • RCW 42.17.260 — Documents and Indexes to Be Made Public

  • RCW 42.17.310 — Certain Personal and Other Records Exempt (private and vital public records that are exempt from disclosure).

  • RCW 42.52.050 — Confidential Information — Improperly Concealed Records.

  • RCW 43.105.041 — Powers and Duties of Board (the powers of the Information Services Board (ISB), and its authority to develop statewide or interagency technology standards and policy).

  • RCW 43.105.200 — Application to Institutions of Higher Education (ISB policy exemptions for institutions of higher education).

  • Chapter 70.02 RCW — Medical Records — Health Care Information Access and Disclosure (Uniform Health Care Information Act).

  • RCW 70.24.105 — Disclosure of HIV Antibody Test or Testing or Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases — Exchange of Medical Information.

  • RCW 71.05.390 through 71.05.420 — Mental health records.

  • RCW 71.34.340 — Information Concerning Treatment of Minors Confidential — Disclosure — Admissible as Evidence with Written Consent (mental health care record of juveniles).

2)   Washington Administrative Code (WAC)

Applicable Washington Administrative Codes include the following:

3)

  Washington Information Services Board (ISB)

The Washington Information Services Board is Washington State's nine-member policy-making body for information technology. Applicable Washington Information Services Board publications include the following:

4)

 

United States Code (U.S.C.)

Applicable United States Codes include the following:

  • (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — provisions for access to many types of records that are exempt from access under the Privacy Act, including many categories of personal information.

  • (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a) Privacy Act—collection, notification, disclosure, and handling requirements of personal data.

  • (15 U.S.C. Sec. 6501 et seq.; 16 C.F.R. Sec. 312) Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 — requirements that a Web site directed at children less than 13 years of age obtain "verifiable parental consent" before collecting personal information from children.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1029) Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Access Devices — prohibitions and penalties associated with unauthorized possession and fraudulent use of access tokens, passwords, etc.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1030) Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers — related to prohibitions associated with unauthorized access and use of electronic systems.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1362) Communication Lines, Stations, or Systems — prohibitions associated with malicious or willful destruction or intent to destroy or disrupt communications systems within the U.S.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. Sec. 605) Wiretap Statutes — prohibitions associated with the use of eavesdropping technology and the interception of electronic mail, radio communications, data transmission, and telephone calls without consent.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 2701 et seq.) Electronic Communications Privacy Act — prohibitions for persons tampering with computers or accessing certain computerized records without authorization. The act also prohibits providers of electronic communications services from disclosing the contents of stored communications.

  • (18 U.S.C. Sec. 2703) Requirements for Government Access — rules for government agencies for obtaining disclosure of an electronic communication from a provider of such services.

  • (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1232g) Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — the protection, accessibility, and disclosure of educational records and the ability to ensure their completeness and accuracy by a student or the parent of a minor student.

  • (29 U.S.C. Sec. 102, et seq.) Employee Retirement Income Security Act — employer requirements to provide employees access to information about their accrued retirement benefits.

  • (39 U.S.C. Sec. 3623) Mail Privacy Statute — prohibitions associated with opening mail without a search warrant or the addressee's consent.

  • (42 U.S.C. Sec. 242m) — prohibitions of disclosure of data collected by the National Centers for Heath Services Research and of health statistics that would identify an individual in any way.

  • (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq.) Equal Employment Opportunity Act — restrictions on the collection and use of information that would result in employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, and a variety of other characteristics.

  • (47 U.S.C. Sec. 1001) Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement — preserving law enforcement's ability to engage in lawful electronic surveillance in the face of new technological developments.

  • (Pub. L. 104-191 Sec. 262, 264: 45 C.F.R. Sec. 160-164) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act — the security and privacy of individually identifiable health information that is maintained or transmitted by a covered entity. In addition, this act requires covered entities to apply many of its provisions to their business associates, researchers, employers, and others.

  • (Pub. L. 107-056) Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 — a variety of special laws specific to countering terrorist acts including expanded investigative options for law enforcement and a student monitoring program (exceptions to FERPA).

5)

  Federal OMB Circular NO. A-130

The UW is a recipient of federal grant money and a contracted service provider of federal Medicare and Medicaid programs through the Medical Center. Therefore, this policy also is designed to conform to best practices and planning set forth in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policies. OMB is a federal organization that works cooperatively with grantmaking agencies and the grantee community. OMB leads development of government-wide policy to ensure that grants are managed properly and that federal dollars are spent in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Federal OMB Circular NO. A-130 provides uniform information resources management policies as required by many federal executive orders and acts including:

  • 44 U.S.C. Sec. 35 — Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
  • 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a — Privacy Act.
  • 40 U.S.C. Sec. 759 — Computer Security Act of 1987.

b.   Other Primary Authorities (NCQA, JCAHO, HCFA, NAIC)

Other primary authorities include the following groups and standards:

  • National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) compliance audit standards.

  • NCQA advisory information system standards (based on work presented in HEDIS Volume 4: A Roadmap for Information Systems).

  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) accreditation criteria.

  • The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) policy bulletins.

  • The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Health Information Privacy Model Act (1998).

c.   Common Criteria

A common set of national and international criteria to guide the development and evaluation of security standards, environments, and systems has been established and maintained by the processes and oversight of the following groups:

  • The Communications Security Establishment (CSE), Canada.
  • The Central Service for Information Systems Security (CSISS), France.
  • The German Information Security Agency (GISA), Germany.
  • The National Communications Security Agency (NCSA), Netherlands.
  • The Communications—Electronics Security Group (CESG), UK.
  • The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), United States.
  • The National Security Agency (NSA), United States.

These measures, called the "Common Criteria," support many legislated and regulatory standards at the national and international levels. UW security personnel track the activities of these groups and reflect the criteria in security policy where appropriate. Compliance with these criteria will be beneficial to the UW for technical and business reasons.

The Common Criteria (CC) are as follows:

  • The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC version 2.1/aligned with ISO IS 15408) (last updated: 19 September 2000).

  • Guide for Production of Protection Profiles and Security, Preliminary Draft Technical Report (PDTR) (last updated: 01 January 2000).

  • CSPP—Guidance for COTS (commercial off the shelf) Security Protection Profiles, version 1.0 NISTIR 6462 (final document: 01 January 2000).

  • CSPP–OS Operating System Protection Profile, draft version 0.3 (last updated: 01 April 2000).

  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Protection Profile, final version 1.0.

  • Federal Government Firewall Protection Profiles, draft version based on CC version 2.0.

  • SCPP—Smart Card Security Users Group Protection Profile, version 2.0 (last updated: 01 June 2000).

d.   Additional Information Sources Regarding Policy Formulation

In addition to the authorities listed above, this security policy also incorporates ideas from numerous applicable sources including:

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Engineering Principles for IT Security.

  • National Research Council Report for the Record: Protecting Electronic Health Information (1997).

  • University of Washington Strategic Goals (as established by the Board of Regents and revised March 1999).

Return to Table of Contents


Top of Page